I prefer the 243 over the 242, for the oil tolerance.
Build in Progress
Collapse
X
-
Upper and magazines came in. Have to say, I'm impressed with the quality. Definitely will be ordering from Precision again.
Comment
-
-
Updated OP with my bipod choice. GGG-1527 sold by Precision Firearms
Custom AR-15 Rifles, Custom Uppers, Custom Lower, 6.5 Grendel, AR15, AR 15, AR-15, AR15 upper, custom upper, Lilja, DPMS, Precision, Precision Firearms, Precision-firearms, percision firearms, custom upper, custom ar, custom ar15, barrels, rifle barrels, Shilen, CAA, Command Arms, Yankee Hill, Yankee Hill Machine, 204 ruger, .204 ruger, 223 wyld
Comment
-
-
I will be ordering the gas block next week as well as acquiring the tools needed to assemble the lower receiver. Although I still need the trigger and stock that I want for it, this will get me a little closer to being able to post up a few build pictures on my build post.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Mecharius View Posthttp://www.midwayusa.com/product/194...rmolded-rubber
considering getting one of these pistol grips for my build.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Mecharius View Posthttp://www.midwayusa.com/product/194...rmolded-rubber
considering getting one of these pistol grips for my build.
Also I can offer a brief insight to the Luth MBA stock. Currently have one on a completed AR-15 lower and my 6.5 upper just shipped yesterday from TX. Getting all ants in my pants, so I threw on my 5.56 upper just to mess around with the Luth stock. I felt it was solid (keep in mind 5.56 @50 yards kneeling) I've used the PRS before and it also is a solid stock (5.56 DMR). The adjustable cheek weld is a great thing to have and both stocks will do great. The Luth is lighter when I had both in hand at the gun shop. The Luth feels stable and comfortable in the kneeling position. If you want to split hairs the Luth may be better for tactical sniper competitions due to the lighter weight = less fatigue over time, if you can even take it that far. The "fatigue" factor there will be more dependent on the kind of shape you're in.
For the money, IMO the Luth MBA does just as good a job as the Magpul PRS. when it comes down to it whatever gives you more confidence/comfort will help you shoot better.Last edited by BigBC; 11-12-2015, 11:10 PM.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by bwaites View PostI love the tactical grips, most of my rifles have them, (the non shelf version) and I actually removed the shelf from the one on my target rifle, as it didn't seem to be much use for me.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by BigBC View PostConsidering this as well, it felt good in the hand and shooting with it as well. Didn't have the shelf on it, but still felt better than the standard M-16 grip and when you are going for range and accuracy like we are trying to do, every little bit of comfort helps IMO.
Also I can offer a brief insight to the Luth MBA stock. Currently have one on a completed AR-15 lower and my 6.5 upper just shipped yesterday from TX. Getting all ants in my pants, so I threw on my 5.56 upper just to mess around with the Luth stock. I felt it was solid (keep in mind 5.56 @50 yards kneeling) I've used the PRS before and it also is a solid stock (5.56 DMR). The adjustable cheek weld is a great thing to have and both stocks will do great. The Luth is lighter when I had both in hand at the gun shop. The Luth feels stable and comfortable in the kneeling position. If you want to split hairs the Luth may be better for tactical sniper competitions due to the lighter weight = less fatigue over time, if you can even take it that far. The "fatigue" factor there will be more dependent on the kind of shape you're in.
For the money, IMO the Luth MBA does just as good a job as the Magpul PRS. when it comes down to it whatever gives you more confidence/comfort will help you shoot better.
as far as my two stock options, im still leaning more towards the PRS. i have a preference towards heavy when it comes to my rifles. i am not set for certain though. from what i have been hearing the only real difference between the two is the weight. with the price difference, its tempting to go with the luth ar. but we will see.
Comment
-
Comment