+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 57

Thread: Contradicting feedback on the 6.5Grendel for hunting

  1. #21
    Warrior sneaky one's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    mpls., mn
    Posts
    928
    Reap- take the leap, of faith. My 20" grendel replaced my 26" 7mm mag.,as my main hunting gun. It has been performing at about 2/3rds. the power/damage -to deer as my- backup .308. Accuracy is inspiring also. Bullet choices are -good- and still growing. You won't be disappointed.

  2. #22
    Bloodstained hydrotech's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    missouri
    Posts
    96
    Wow stokesrj! That big horn is awesome! I worked for the grand canyon science center for a couple years before moving back to Missouri. I never did hunt out there because there was no hunting in the park, and I really didn't have any skills for the vast terrain of adjacent forest service land, and I didn't meet any co workers or befriend any hunters while out there working for the park service. Sure was different from Missouri. Lots of anti hunting vegetarians and hippies where I was Lol! But I sure loved watching the wildlife. I found an atypical mike deer shed with 9 points on one antler and always hoped to find a big horn skull but never did. I sure like that bighorn you got! I really like reading your posts too, sounds like you have a lot if knowledge to share.

  3. #23
    Warrior
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Albuquerque, NM
    Posts
    116
    screw the rifles, too easy, use a bow, my 2010 New Mexico Bull Elk:



    awesome Sheep stokes....

    .
    Last edited by elkbow; 02-09-2012 at 06:11 AM.

  4. #24
    Bloodstained
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    25
    "Several sources I have talked to say that the 6.5 Grendel would be nothing better than a coyote round."

    Clearly, these people have absoplutely no knowledge of the ballistics of the round. Or, they are the sort who think that it takes a .340 Weatherby to kill a deer.

    The 6.5 Grendel is, ballistically speaking, a long range .30-30. Whatever you think can be done with a .30-30, the Grendel can do at roughly twice the distance. In my book, that is elk out to 200 yards or so, and deer and antelope out to farther than I would shoot. Of course, if you want to shoot coyotes you can do that, too.

    IMGP0178C.jpg

  5. #25
    Chieftain JASmith's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Livermore, CA
    Posts
    1,048
    Quote Originally Posted by Ullr View Post
    The 6.5 Grendel is, ballistically speaking, a long range .30-30. Whatever you think can be done with a .30-30, the Grendel can do at roughly twice the distance. In my book, that is elk out to 200 yards or so, and deer and antelope out to farther than I would shoot. Of course, if you want to shoot coyotes you can do that, too.
    Nicely said!

    Your rule of thumb takes into account both bullet performance and "average" hunter ability to judge range, wind, slope, etc. and to make ethical shots!
    Nevermore...
    ShootersNotes.com

  6. #26
    Warrior Smoke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    N.C.
    Posts
    123
    This comes from a gun dealer and competitive Long range shooter ..

    I have killed many deer with many calibers at very long distances ( up to 437 Yds)

    the grendel kills them just as dead as my 300 WBY did with much less recoil and sound ..
    Thats all I need to stick with the grendel

    Thanks

    Smoke

  7. #27
    Warrior
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Central Florida
    Posts
    484
    And.. I dont think it even posible to get "scoped" by grendel.

  8. #28
    Unwashed
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    17
    I would have no problem using the Grendel on antelope and deer, in fact that's what I carried this year while hunting for them. Just didn't find any keepers. I was with my buddy when he took his elk at 300 yards with a 6.5, while not a Grendel, the bullet performed well. I personally would want a little more energy at range on a big bull elk or moose, but only if comfortable shooting it. There is a lot to be said about a round that you can shoot consistently and have faith in its accuracy when it comes time to pull the trigger with fur in the scope.

  9. #29
    Chieftain LRRPF52's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Rocky Mountains
    Posts
    4,121
    When you look at all the game and types of game that have been taken with the 6.5 Swede, especially taking into consideration that it was loaded to very mild pressures back from its introduction through the last century, it's hysterical to see hunters in the US turn their nose up at the Grendel as not being enough gun/caliber. I mean, the Swede has been used for everything from rabbits to elephants, and is the go-to cartridge in Northern Europe for Moose. It just is. Someone forgot to give them the memo I guess.

  10. #30
    Chieftain JASmith's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Livermore, CA
    Posts
    1,048
    Got to remember that we americans think we invented "bigger, faster, better..."

    Small wonder that some think that 300 Magnum is the lightest practical game caliber -- my dad did. Actually he used a .375 H&H Magnum for deer and rabbits.
    Last edited by JASmith; 02-20-2012 at 07:38 PM.
    Nevermore...
    ShootersNotes.com

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts