+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 18

Thread: Elk with the Grendel

  1. #1

    Elk with the Grendel

    One of my buddies in Utah said he saw a guy last year take a Cow Elk at 300 yds with a Grendel. Seems on the light side anyone else have a experience with Elk with this cartridge. ED

  2. #2
    Chieftain Variable's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    NRA/GOA/SAF Life.... West Virginia
    Posts
    1,343
    Mark Larue took a Bull Elk at over 400 yards with one.

  3. #3
    Warrior JohnOD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Central Oregon
    Posts
    255
    I don't have any Elk hunting experience with the Grendel but with good shot placement it would do the job. So would a 223 Rem with the right bullet. IMHO its hard to justify the Grendel as an Elk hunting cartridge .

  4. #4
    Warrior
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    The mitten
    Posts
    419
    Shooting animals at great distances relative to a given cartridge and game animal requires shot placement over anything else as often the energy shokwave generated at impact is so much less that said if you punch a 1/4-1/2 inch hole in an animals heart or lungs and it will die but as range increases hitting that shot window becomes more difficult

  5. #5
    Moderator bwaites's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    NRA Member, SAF Member Central Washington State
    Posts
    2,794
    Ethical hunting practices are an individual issue. The Grendel at 400 yards has a significantly greater energy delivery than any bow does, but bow hunters take thousands of animals ethically every year. Elk, Bison, and hogs are all taken with air guns every year, and they have significantly less energy than the Grendel does, too. Heck, air guns have taken Cape buffalo as well.

    Of course, shot placement is critical, but todays bullets, if properly chosen, will drop animals. Properly chosen bullets won't blow up on contact, they will penetrate and do tremendous damage.
    “The rifle itself has no moral stature, since it has no will of its own. Naturally, it may be used by evil men for evil purposes, but there are more good men than evil, and while the latter cannot be persuaded to the path of righteousness by propaganda, they can certainly be corrected by good men with rifles.”
    Jeff Cooper

  6. #6
    Warrior
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    The mitten
    Posts
    419
    The archery example is only partially analogous as many bows when shooting broad heads will out penitrate a 30-06 at the muzzle my bow has less kinetic energy than a 22 lr but I have yet to not fully penitrate and pass through a white tail though when hunting with a rifle at extended ranges the technique of shot placement becomes the same yo have to cause direct damage to a vital organ or blood vessel in order to insure a clean kill

  7. #7
    Warrior
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    198
    I know in Africa they throw kinetic energy (weight of projectile x velocity squared) out the window, and better utilize momentum (weight of projectile x velocity) which better correlates with penetration, which is what is important there. Bullet construction of course is critical and can make or break the difference. For example, you can take a .22 LR and theoretically run it at 6000 fps, and it will have the same kinetic energy as a .500 Jeffery shooting a 530 grain bullet. Which one would you want to shoot the elephant with? Bullet weight x velocity changes the character of the argument significantly hence the effectiveness of the bow where the projectile weight times the velocity is a significant value. With the Grendel, and a good bullet that retains all of its weight, and a good velocity, it can get the job done, but just as in the bow, shot placement is critical. So it boils down to, how good of a shot can you make at distance, with the wind on this side of the valley different from the wind on the other side of the valley. If you can make a killing shot, go for it. If you're not sure, wait for a better opportunity.
    The genius of Weatherby was magnificent, but the philosopy of "velocity is what kills" is not absolute, and requires consideration commensurate with the task at hand.

  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by bwaites View Post
    Ethical hunting practices are an individual issue. The Grendel at 400 yards has a significantly greater energy delivery than any bow does, but bow hunters take thousands of animals ethically every year. Elk, Bison, and hogs are all taken with air guns every year, and they have significantly less energy than the Grendel does, too. Heck, air guns have taken Cape buffalo as well.

    Of course, shot placement is critical, but todays bullets, if properly chosen, will drop animals. Properly chosen bullets won't blow up on contact, they will penetrate and do tremendous damage.
    Yes good point I have taken over 75 hogs with a bow 12 blacktail out to 71 yds but a arrow makes a heck of a hole completley different wound channel and the bleeding is UFR. As always thanks for input. ED

  9. #9
    Chieftain LRRPF52's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Rocky Mountains
    Posts
    4,089
    There are threads with pics here in the hunting section of forum members who have dropped a few elk without issue.

  10. #10
    Unwashed
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    North Central Idaho
    Posts
    20
    It worked for me. Just use a quality bullet and know your capabilities. Shot placement is everything. Don't try and reach the lungs or heart through the butt and you will be fine! I personally felt my gun and myself were capable out to the 200 to 300 yard range.

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts