One of my buddies in Utah said he saw a guy last year take a Cow Elk at 300 yds with a Grendel. Seems on the light side anyone else have a experience with Elk with this cartridge. ED
One of my buddies in Utah said he saw a guy last year take a Cow Elk at 300 yds with a Grendel. Seems on the light side anyone else have a experience with Elk with this cartridge. ED
Mark Larue took a Bull Elk at over 400 yards with one.
I don't have any Elk hunting experience with the Grendel but with good shot placement it would do the job. So would a 223 Rem with the right bullet. IMHO its hard to justify the Grendel as an Elk hunting cartridge .
Shooting animals at great distances relative to a given cartridge and game animal requires shot placement over anything else as often the energy shokwave generated at impact is so much less that said if you punch a 1/4-1/2 inch hole in an animals heart or lungs and it will die but as range increases hitting that shot window becomes more difficult
Ethical hunting practices are an individual issue. The Grendel at 400 yards has a significantly greater energy delivery than any bow does, but bow hunters take thousands of animals ethically every year. Elk, Bison, and hogs are all taken with air guns every year, and they have significantly less energy than the Grendel does, too. Heck, air guns have taken Cape buffalo as well.
Of course, shot placement is critical, but todays bullets, if properly chosen, will drop animals. Properly chosen bullets won't blow up on contact, they will penetrate and do tremendous damage.
"The root cause is not that islam has a fundamentally flawed ideology with violence and degradation for all those overcome by its ravenous doctrine or the intended spread of its evil dominance in ever increasing areas but that there is a spiritual battle that is being waged between good and evil."
Von Gruff
The archery example is only partially analogous as many bows when shooting broad heads will out penitrate a 30-06 at the muzzle my bow has less kinetic energy than a 22 lr but I have yet to not fully penitrate and pass through a white tail though when hunting with a rifle at extended ranges the technique of shot placement becomes the same yo have to cause direct damage to a vital organ or blood vessel in order to insure a clean kill
I know in Africa they throw kinetic energy (weight of projectile x velocity squared) out the window, and better utilize momentum (weight of projectile x velocity) which better correlates with penetration, which is what is important there. Bullet construction of course is critical and can make or break the difference. For example, you can take a .22 LR and theoretically run it at 6000 fps, and it will have the same kinetic energy as a .500 Jeffery shooting a 530 grain bullet. Which one would you want to shoot the elephant with? Bullet weight x velocity changes the character of the argument significantly hence the effectiveness of the bow where the projectile weight times the velocity is a significant value. With the Grendel, and a good bullet that retains all of its weight, and a good velocity, it can get the job done, but just as in the bow, shot placement is critical. So it boils down to, how good of a shot can you make at distance, with the wind on this side of the valley different from the wind on the other side of the valley. If you can make a killing shot, go for it. If you're not sure, wait for a better opportunity.
The genius of Weatherby was magnificent, but the philosopy of "velocity is what kills" is not absolute, and requires consideration commensurate with the task at hand.
There are threads with pics here in the hunting section of forum members who have dropped a few elk without issue.
It worked for me. Just use a quality bullet and know your capabilities. Shot placement is everything. Don't try and reach the lungs or heart through the butt and you will be fine! I personally felt my gun and myself were capable out to the 200 to 300 yard range.