+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 18

Thread: Hornady 129 SST with 8208 XBR

  1. #1
    Warrior BjornF16's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    963

    Hornady 129 SST with 8208 XBR

    Went to the range this am with some 129 SSTs loaded up with 8208XBR. Also shot some of my previous OCW load (AA Entry) of 129 SST driven by AA2230 for comparison.

    My current rig is Satern 18" in AA upper, adjustable gas block, Vortex PST 2.5-10x44, WCI brake.

    The XBR loads were 26.2 gr, 26.7 gr and 27.2 gr. The 27.2 looked most promising and I don't believe showed any high pressure signs (I could use some expertise here).

    If someone can also explain the variation in groupings (vertical, horizontal spreads), I would appreciate it.

    The AA2230 load was 25.5 gr and had proven to be the most accurate of the AA2230 loads I tested in my AA Entry. The velocity is too low for my liking...

    IMG_0016.jpgIMG_0019.jpgIMG_0024.jpgIMG_0025.jpgIMG_0022.jpgIMG_0023.jpg
    Last edited by BjornF16; 06-08-2012 at 08:48 PM.

  2. #2
    Warrior BjornF16's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    963
    Additional pics of 27.2 gr loaded brass:
    Attached Images

  3. #3
    Marksmanship Moderator
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    786
    Quote Originally Posted by BjornF16 View Post
    Went to the range this am with some 129 SSTs loaded up with 8208XBR. Also shot some of my previous OCW load (AA Entry) of 129 SST driven by AA2230 for comparison.

    My current rig is Satern 18" in AA upper, adjustable gas block, Vortex PST 2.5-10x44, WCI brake.

    The XBR loads were 26.2 gr, 26.7 gr and 27.2 gr. The 27.2 looked most promising and I don't believe showed any high pressure signs (I could use some expertise here).

    If someone can also explain the variation in groupings (vertical, horizontal spreads), I would appreciate it.

    The AA2230 load was 25.8 gr and had proven to be the most accurate of the AA2230 loads I tested in my AA Entry. The velocity is too low for my liking...

    Attachment 1565Attachment 1566Attachment 1564Attachment 1568Attachment 1562Attachment 1563
    Bjorn:

    Should have attended the Boomershoot Clinic. You may still have shot those groups but you would also be able to figure out why.

    Basically, did your shots land within your call area or not? If they 'went to call', your loads are fine. If they didn't 'go to call', something is wrong. Could be your loads, rifle, optic, or a combination but if they did not go to call, it is a mechanical problem.

    Another thing. Five shots isn't enough to make good conclusions, either. Choose the one you think is best and load ten more. Then fire two more strings of five and see.

    LR1955

  4. #4
    Warrior Bwild97's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Southern Oregon
    Posts
    627
    How are you supporting the rifle, (Bipod/shoulder), (bipod/mono pod), (bag/shoulder), (bag/bag), benchrest vice.

    Group spreads; (in my experiences) The horizontal spread could be a function of your heart beat, the blood that pulses through your veins will slightly alter POA The tighter you hold, the greater the effect. Unless you have your rifle mounted in a benchrest vice, you shouldn't read into the groups too much. (just my Opinion)

    The primers look good, but I have learned to not trust small primers for gauging pressure signs. Ejector\Extractor, shadowing/swiping are constant affects that indicate pressures are nearing the dangerous.

  5. #5
    Chieftain LRRPF52's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Rocky Mountains
    Posts
    4,089
    What range were these groups printed at? 100yds, or 200yds? It looks like your chrono data doesn't show any crazy spikes in velocity. I would suggest running some ladder tests at 200yds, and marking your bullet tips with a permanent marker for each load. Then see where the nodes are. Shoot from a rest, if possible. At a minimum, use a rear bag in addition to your frontal support.

    That Satern barrel should group much tighter than that with the right load.

  6. #6
    Warrior BjornF16's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    963
    From a concrete bench. The hand guard is resting on sandbag support; my left hand pulls the stock into my shoulder (between deltoid and pectoral) and also fine tunes the elevation (resting on top of a sandbag). My right hand is relaxed, not squeezing the pistol grip, fingertip pressure on SSA-E trigger. I can see my heartbeat moving the sight less than 1/4 MOA. All shots had same aim point at 100 yds. Surprised at each shot. (not saying I'm a great shot, but I have been able to achieve .5 MOA in the past with my former Entry).

    For each group, I shot 1, examined the case, then loaded up the next 4. Paused only to record the chrono data. No more than 1 minute between shots in the group of 5.

    In my previous load development efforts, I have also seen large horizontal and vertical groupings that tighten up when approaching an optimum load...I just can't remember the reason for the vertical and the reason for the horizontal spreads (other than flinches, which I don't think was really the case today). This was the first attempt at load development for this rifle. Previously I had only shot factory ammo through it, with the Berger 115 being just under 1 MOA. Both of my Grendels did not shoot that well with factory loads.

    I followed the OCW load development technique (see http://optimalchargeweight.embarqspace.com/) for the AA2230 load on my 19.5 AA Entry (ER Shaw). Interestingly, it shot well in my Satern Spartan 18" (I rushed this 5 shot group). I think the OCW is similar to the Optimal Barrel Time theory (see http://the-long-family.com/optimal%20barrel%20time.htm).

    My game plan is to load 10 each at 27.0, 27.2, 27.4 gr 8208XBR and compare; looking for a good node (I'm using Lyman 1200 DPS2).

    I really wanted to attend the Boomershoot clinic, but didn't have enough time to plan for it this year once I learned of it's existence. I'd like to attend the next one, but it is a pretty long haul from Texas.

  7. #7
    Moderator bwaites's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    NRA Member, SAF Member Central Washington State
    Posts
    2,795
    Boomershoot is a long trip for you, but we'd really like to have you there. Your technique sounds reasonable, but there may be some pointers that LRRPF52 and LR1955 can help with.

    Sounds like you are using a looser hold on the rifle. Some AR's like to be locked in tight, so you might try that. I seem to go back and forth depending on how well I'm shooting. Lately, I've been more relaxed, and seem to be shooting a bit better.
    “The rifle itself has no moral stature, since it has no will of its own. Naturally, it may be used by evil men for evil purposes, but there are more good men than evil, and while the latter cannot be persuaded to the path of righteousness by propaganda, they can certainly be corrected by good men with rifles.”
    Jeff Cooper

  8. #8
    Warrior BjornF16's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    963
    I tried a really loose hold in the past...groups really opened up. I wouldn't say that I am locked in tight; maybe halfway between.

    I also tried a Caldwell Lead Sled DFT...didn't work so well. Barrel seemed to jump up too much. Not sure if I didn't have enough weight on it or what. I certainly didn't restrain the rifle in the sled.

    My left hand rests in the "nook" of the PRS stock, and really "pushes" the stock into my shoulder. Nothing is holding the front of the rifle down on the sandbag.
    Last edited by BjornF16; 06-03-2012 at 08:43 PM. Reason: additional info

  9. #9
    Marksmanship Moderator
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    786
    Quote Originally Posted by BjornF16 View Post
    I tried a really loose hold in the past...groups really opened up. I wouldn't say that I am locked in tight; maybe halfway between.

    I also tried a Caldwell Lead Sled DFT...didn't work so well. Barrel seemed to jump up too much. Not sure if I didn't have enough weight on it or what. I certainly didn't restrain the rifle in the sled.

    My left hand rests in the "nook" of the PRS stock, and really "pushes" the stock into my shoulder. Nothing is holding the front of the rifle down on the sandbag.
    Bjorn:

    Some folks believe horizontal stringing is due to too high a velocity. And vertical due to too low a velocity. I am skeptical to a degree but when other things don't give a solution, I sometimes go with it. Since your groups were vertical more than horizontal, and you think that as you approach max that they tighten up, perhaps there is something to this saying.

    Also, if you are shooting on a slow cadence, individually loading and shooting and looking through your scope between shots -- most likely it is you. Load five in your magazine, get into a confident and solid position, and shoot them in about fifteen or twenty seconds without looking between shots. Attend to holding your sight picture throughout the shot, take your breath, settle in and shoot again. All five with your attention focused on sight picture. My bet is that you will see your performance improve with all of your loads.

    LR1955

  10. #10
    Warrior BjornF16's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    963
    Quote Originally Posted by LR1955 View Post
    Also, if you are shooting on a slow cadence, individually loading and shooting and looking through your scope between shots -- most likely it is you. Load five in your magazine, get into a confident and solid position, and shoot them in about fifteen or twenty seconds without looking between shots. Attend to holding your sight picture throughout the shot, take your breath, settle in and shoot again. All five with your attention focused on sight picture. My bet is that you will see your performance improve with all of your loads.
    Well, this gives me a reason to buy a chrono with printer! I've been using a borrowed chrono.

    My shooting was better before using the chrono; but I also believe groups will "tighten up" as optimum load is approached (I saw this before using chrono when developing the AA2230 load). I never really thought about it but my shooting was better before borrowing the chrono.

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts