![]() |
|
Why bullpups? - Printable Version +- 6.5 Grendel Forum (https://65grendel.com) +-- Forum: 6.5 GRENDEL DISCUSSION FORUMS (https://65grendel.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=3) +--- Forum: 6.5 Grendel Military & Law Enforcement (https://65grendel.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=13) +--- Thread: Why bullpups? (/showthread.php?tid=7715) Pages:
1
2
|
Why bullpups? - stanc - 01-30-2016 http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2015/12/10/new-zealand-defence-force-releases-sneak-peak-new-carbine/ [video=youtube;HdOE65hxvRQ]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HdOE65hxvRQ[/video] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HdOE65hxvRQ Note the bayonet lug at the 3 o'clock position on the barrel instead of the usual 6 o'clock mounting. Also the combination flash suppressor/muzzle brake. Why bullpups? - yoni - 03-16-2017 I really like my Tavor, it is a great little rifle. SBR sized without SBR issues. The only thing I don't like is as of now it can't be converted to 6.5 Grendel. Why bullpups? - n9nwo - 04-19-2017 VASCAR2 Wrote:I bought a Tavor in January and so far I really like it. I'm using the standard trigger pack and for CQB/off hand shooting it is fine. I really like the ergo's and the compact size. The Tavor is easily shot from the week side and it is easy to use one handed. The design makes it very easy to use your weak hand to open doors or similar task. I really like the Tavor X95. Nearly a PWD in size in the SBR format. Very modular thus able to adapt to multiple missions. Longer barrel for DMR or IAR. SBR for CQB. Either keep the current configuration for 6.5x39 (6.5 Grendel) or modified to do 6.5x45. Why bullpups? - chic - 02-23-2018 I know this is a little old, but why does no one consider electrically primed cartridges when they consider triggers? It's used on big stuff and worked on small stuff, but didn't become popular. Why bullpups? - VASCAR2 - 02-23-2018 Anything electrical can fail and the military and LE are reluctant to stray away from what works and is cheap. Look at a WW I bolt action rifle like SMLE, 03 Springfield or Mauser, still very formidable weapon with good ammunition. Will an electrically primed ammunition and rifle be just as effective in 100 years? If 30 06 ammunition was stored properly since manufacture in 1939 I bet it would still be safe to shoot today. Just my opinion. Since I posted about my Tavor I added a Geissele trigger pack. The Super Sabra trigger pack gives the Tavor as good a two stage trigger as my Geissele G2S trigger in my AR-15. I'm not getting rid of my AR-15's or my Tavor as each have their own unique characteristics and advantages. Why bullpups? - stanc - 02-24-2018 VASCAR2 Wrote:Anything electrical can fail and the military and LE are reluctant to stray away from what works and is cheap. Look at a WW I bolt action rifle like SMLE, 03 Springfield or Mauser, still very formidable weapon with good ammunition. Will an electrically primed ammunition and rifle be just as effective in 100 years? If 30 06 ammunition was stored properly since manufacture in 1939 I bet it would still be safe to shoot today.I bet you're right. ![]() Here's a test of 1942 manufacture .30 M2 AP. [video=youtube;hzYH8ap1TDo]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hzYH8ap1TDo[/video] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hzYH8ap1TDo Why bullpups? - Keef - 02-24-2018 I love my 7.62 x39 bullpup. If I could convert it to a 6.5g it would be perfect. Why bullpups? - SHORT-N-SASSY - 02-24-2018 VASCAR2 Wrote:Anything electrical can fail and the military and LE are reluctant to stray away from what works and is cheap. . . . But, for a sporting/target Bullpup, a 1.66 ounce trigger pull is sweet ecstasy --- ![]() I remember a day: July 11, 1979, the day the SKYLAB space station re-entered the Earth's atmosphere. That's the day all the components of my experimental Bullpup, with electronically-actuated trigger-to-sear arrangement, came together --- ![]() Not surprisingly, I named it, "SKY-PUP" --- ![]() |