+- 6.5 Grendel Forum (https://65grendel.com)
+-- Forum: 6.5 GRENDEL DISCUSSION FORUMS (https://65grendel.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=3)
+--- Forum: 6.5 Grendel Military & Law Enforcement (https://65grendel.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=13)
+--- Thread: US Army selects 7.62 NATO for future infantry rifle (/showthread.php?tid=1516)
Pages:
1
2
US Army selects 7.62 NATO for future infantry rifle - stanc - 11-21-2011
It looks like 6.5 Grendel is not going to replace 5.56 NATO.
I just learned the Army has chosen to equip "Future War Fighters" with an upgraded 7.62mm M14 rifle.
M14 bullpup in testing:
![[Image: image3.jpg]](http://www.shortrifles.com/Site/gallery/album1/image3.jpg)
Future Soldiers with M14 bullpup and all-around hard body armor.
![[Image: image11.jpg]](http://www.shortrifles.com/Site/gallery/album1/image11.jpg)
Okay, I'm kidding. The M14 bullpup was chosen only to use in an Army (recruiting?) commercial. But the site http://www.shortrifles.com/ is worth visiting if only to hear the "I am a Soldier" song.
(Note the song takes a little while to load and play after entering the site.)
US Army selects 7.62 NATO for future infantry rifle - hm2 clark - 11-22-2011
Looks like they belong in the movie STARSHIP TROOPERS recruiting commmercial. Would you like to know more?
US Army selects 7.62 NATO for future infantry rifle - jwilson1985 - 11-22-2011
sh*t i thought it was halo 3d lol
US Army selects 7.62 NATO for future infantry rifle - mlmiller1 - 11-22-2011
Main thing I remember about Starship troopers was Dina Meyer!!!!! ;-) Oh yeah, they did have on some kind of armor in a big part of the movie, didn't they? UHH, something about Bugs.
US Army selects 7.62 NATO for future infantry rifle - RangerRick - 11-22-2011
mlmiller1 Wrote:Main thing I remember about Starship troopers was Dina Meyer!!!!! ;-) Oh yeah, they did have on some kind of armor in a big part of the movie, didn't they? UHH, something about Bugs.
Yeah, particularly the coed shower scene. If I had been in there with her you would have been able to mount a 50 cal on the old johnson! LOL.
RR
US Army selects 7.62 NATO for future infantry rifle - jwilson1985 - 11-22-2011
RangerRick Wrote:Yeah, particularly the coed shower scene. If I had been in there with her you would have been able to mount a 50 cal on the old johnson! LOL.copy that!!!!
RR
US Army selects 7.62 NATO for future infantry rifle - stanc - 11-22-2011
RangerRick Wrote:Yeah, particularly the coed shower scene. If I had been in there with her you would have been able to mount a 50 cal on the old johnson! LOL.One shower scene, as requested ("in bed" scene included):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v0rheyrgdAo
"In bed" scene (alternate ending):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-g9ISrG_qA0
US Army selects 7.62 NATO for future infantry rifle - QuadCam - 11-22-2011
This guy doesn't look like to be in proper shape for an military action. He's going for the Larry Vickers look!
US Army selects 7.62 NATO for future infantry rifle - mlmiller1 - 11-22-2011
Ok, now I need a cold shower. She is pretty doggone HOT!
Now, Back to shooting!!!!!!! FOCUS, FOCUS!
US Army selects 7.62 NATO for future infantry rifle - stanc - 12-08-2011
Regarding military bullpups, here's an interesting video of one being fired from both shoulders.
Note the shooter does not change firing hand from right to left!
[video=youtube;j7piT-qM3Tk]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j7piT-qM3Tk[/video]
US Army selects 7.62 NATO for future infantry rifle - bwaites - 12-08-2011
That looks like a recipe to lose a finger!
US Army selects 7.62 NATO for future infantry rifle - Kikn - 12-08-2011
how could you lose a finger?
US Army selects 7.62 NATO for future infantry rifle - bwaites - 12-09-2011
Kikn Wrote:how could you lose a finger?
Watch how close his left index finger is to the end of the barrel.
US Army selects 7.62 NATO for future infantry rifle - H2O MAN - 12-18-2011
stanc Wrote:It looks like 6.5 Grendel is not going to replace 5.56 NATO.
I just learned the Army has chosen to equip "Future War Fighters" with an upgraded 7.62mm M14 rifle.
Okay, I'm kidding. The M14 bullpup was chosen only to use in an Army (recruiting?) commercial.
But the site http://www.shortrifles.com/ is worth visiting if only to hear the "I am a Soldier" song.
Hello, that song is great and the bullpup conversions currently available for the M14 are very interesting.
I've spent the past 5 months getting to know my M14 bullpup conversion ... it's a work in progress.
US Army selects 7.62 NATO for future infantry rifle - OldCannon - 12-18-2011
As a bullpup owner, I can tell you that the concussive effects on your ears is MUCH stronger vs a standard AR platform if you have no hearing protection (To be clear, I did NOT volunteer to test my rifles that way). I definitely do NOT see bullpup configurations in the "Future Warfighter" configuration. In fact, I'd daresay that the future caliber, IF there really is one, will be one that has the same total cartridge weight as the current 5.56, and preferably able to have 30 rounds in a magazine not much larger than what we have now. Otherwise, I think it's a complete non-starter.
US Army selects 7.62 NATO for future infantry rifle - independentrider1 - 01-01-2012
why do they have welding helmets on their shoulders?
US Army selects 7.62 NATO for future infantry rifle - sgt_murf - 01-02-2012
stanc Wrote:It looks like 6.5 Grendel is not going to replace 5.56 NATO.
I just learned the Army has chosen to equip "Future War Fighters" with an upgraded 7.62mm M14 rifle.
M14 bullpup in testing:
Future Soldiers with M14 bullpup and all-around hard body armor.
Okay, I'm kidding. The M14 bullpup was chosen only to use in an Army (recruiting?) commercial. But the site http://www.shortrifles.com/ is worth visiting if only to hear the "I am a Soldier" song.
(Note the song takes a little while to load and play after entering the site.)
While Stanc meant this as humor what I find humorish is that the British placed in the running a cartridge it was the .280 British in varying versions up to the new and improved .30 British to get their caliber into trials to satisfy the Americans. The US army then 7.62x51 was selected over it (.280 Brit). The British used the .280 for a short time until Winston Churchill dictated the use 7.62x51. The Air Force later chose the 5.56mm and then SEC DoD Robert Strange McNamara dictated the Army to use the M16 and the 5.56mm even though the Army never wanted the 5.56mm at the beginning.
US Army selects 7.62 NATO for future infantry rifle - noone - 01-03-2012
So who does that song?
US Army selects 7.62 NATO for future infantry rifle - LRRPF52 - 01-03-2012
sgt_murf Wrote:While Stanc meant this as humor what I find humorish is that the British placed in the running a cartridge it was the .280 British in varying versions up to the new and improved .30 British to get their caliber into trials to satisfy the Americans. The US army then 7.62x51 was selected over it (.280 Brit). The British used the .280 for a short time until Winston Churchill dictated the use 7.62x51. The Air Force later chose the 5.56mm and then SEC DoD Robert Strange McNamara dictated the Army to use the M16 and the 5.56mm even though the Army never wanted the 5.56mm at the beginning.
SF, Airborne, Airmobile, and other Infantry units liked the M16/5.56 quite well actually. It's probably the only caliber the military ever adopted that was done outside the corrupt procurement process, and has benefited the services more than any other caliber/system that I can think of. 7.62 NATO should have never left the drawing board, as the British .280 would have been much better, or a .276 Pedersen derivative shortened to a 38-42mm case for DMR's and LMG's in the 1950's. The institutional pillars of wisdom had other thoughts in mind, none of which paid much attention to what had shifted in terms of maneuver land warfare and logistics chains, as well as terminal performance. The SCHV concept was the best thing to counter-balance the old guard of Army ordnance corps thinking, and the M16 family's success has proven itself longer than any other shoulder-fired system in the US military's history.
US Army selects 7.62 NATO for future infantry rifle - stanc - 01-08-2012
LRRPF52 Wrote:...the M16 family's success has proven itself longer than any other shoulder-fired system in the US military's history.5.56mm M16 family: <50 years
.69 caliber muskets: ~75 years