6.5 Grendel Forum
.264 USA on TFB - Printable Version

+- 6.5 Grendel Forum (https://65grendel.com)
+-- Forum: 6.5 GRENDEL DISCUSSION FORUMS (https://65grendel.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=3)
+--- Forum: 6.5 Grendel Military & Law Enforcement (https://65grendel.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=13)
+--- Thread: .264 USA on TFB (/showthread.php?tid=8561)

.264 USA on TFB - JDub - 11-11-2014

Saw this on TFB:

http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2014/11/10/usamu-264-usa/

Chime in!

I think the fact that it would require a new lower would make this a no-go.

.264 USA on TFB - stanc - 01-19-2018

CTTSO Releases Solicitation for .264 USA Rifles, Carbines, PDWs http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2018/01/17/cttso-releases-solicitation-264-usa-rifles-carbines-pdws/
Quote:The specifications for the new weapon are quire ambitious, with a threshold velocity requirement of 2,650 ft/s with a 108gr bullet, and an objective requirement of 2,750 ft/s with the same, both from an 11.5″ barrel!


.264 USA on TFB - mdram - 01-19-2018

JDub Wrote:Saw this on TFB:

http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2014/11/10/usamu-264-usa/

Chime in!

I think the fact that it would require a new lower would make this a no-go.


couldnt it just use ar10 lowers?

.264 USA on TFB - BluntForceTrauma - 01-19-2018

The one solution I would NOT oppose.

But still more power than 90% of engagements need.

6.5 Grendel is still the answer. Still compact, both weapons and ammo. Recoil still at max for newly trained troops. Performance well balanced with all the rest. Only thing against it is Not Invented Here syndrome. Gotta spend a bunch of tax-payer money re-inventing the wheel and chasing our tails.

Want more velocity from an 11.5 inch barrel? Use a copper slug M855A1 analog in 6.5mm weighing, oh, 95 grains in 6.5 Grendel.

.264 USA on TFB - stanc - 01-20-2018

BluntForceTrauma Wrote:6.5 Grendel is still the answer. Still compact, both weapons and ammo. Recoil still at max for newly trained troops. Performance well balanced with all the rest. Only thing against it is Not Invented Here syndrome.

Want more velocity from an 11.5 inch barrel? Use a copper slug M855A1 analog in 6.5mm weighing, oh, 95 grains in 6.5 Grendel.
Yes, you can boost MV by using such an ultra-lightweight bullet, but then BC will go in the crapper and take long range performance down with it.
While I agree that 6.5 Grendel would be a better choice for carbines, I think .264 USA would be superior to replace 7.62 NATO for machine guns.

[Image: CtY9EAfWcAETpu8.jpg]

All things considered, it looks to me like they want a "do over" of the one-caliber/one-gun concept that gave us the 7.62 NATO cartridge and M14 rifle.
Except this time they're going with a cartridge of more reasonable power, and a modular weapon that can be configured as SMG, carbine, and DMR.