Texas Files SCOTUS Lawsuit against States who violated electoral laws

[PVBoom]

I can't count the times I've seen mentioned in our leftist news about "Trump's baseless claims of widespread voter fraud".
Maybe I'm nitpickin, but if there's ANY evidence, then his claims aren't "baseless".
I found this today. 68% error in one county using those Dominion machines.

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/202...rate-one-/

That has been debunked as shown by other articles. I posted above the Detroit News article about what happened in Antrim.

Here is another article about the crap research that one guy is doing, who is claiming issues with Antrim County

https://www.freep.com/story/news/politic...538325002/
[FONT=&quot]LANSING — State officials are disputing a report on Antrim County's voting equipment — signed by a consultant who confused Michigan and Minnesota voting districts in an earlier election analysis — that says the county's equipment "is intentionally and purposefully designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and influence election results."[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Michigan Elections Director Jonathan Brater said in a weekend court filing the report "makes a series of unsupported conclusions, ascribes motives of fraud and obfuscation to processes that are easily explained as routine election procedures or error corrections, and suggests without explanation that elements of election software not used in Michigan are somehow responsible for tabulation or reporting errors that are either nonexistent or easily explained."
[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]And Dominion Voting Systems, the company whose equipment is used in Antrim, issued a statement saying it is the subject of a "continuing malicious and widespread disinformation campaign" intended to undermine confidence in the Nov. 3 election.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Judge Kevin Elsenheimer of Michigan's 13th Circuit Court ordered the release of the report Monday, following minor redactions of references to software coding that were agreed to by both sides. State and county officials withdrew earlier objections to the report's release.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]The report is signed by Russell Ramsland of Allied Security Operations Group.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Ramsland, a cybersecurity analyst and former Republican congressional candidate, mistook voting jurisdictions in Minnesota for Michigan towns in one recent flawed analysis of voter turnout in the Nov. 3 election. In another, filed in support of a federal lawsuit filed in Michigan, he made wildly inaccurate claims about voter turnout in various Michigan municipalities claiming that Detroit, where turnout was 51%, had turnout of 139%, and that North Muskegon, which had turnout of 78%, had voter turnout of 782%.
Elsenheimer ordered "forensic imaging" of the Dominion Voting Systems voting tabulators and related software after Antrim County resident William Bailey filed a lawsuit that challenged the integrity of the election equipment, citing errors in how the county initially reported its unofficial results.
[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Elsenheimer, a former Republican lawmaker, did not base his order on unofficial results that showed Democrat Joe Biden got more votes than Republican President Donald Trump in the solidly GOP county — a mistake both county and state officials have attributed to an error the Republican clerk made when updating ballot information. Instead, the judge cited a closely decided village proposal to allow a marijuana dispensary.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]On Dec. 6, a team from ASOG, a Dallas-area firm that has worked with lawyers for Trump and his allies on cases challenging election results in battleground states, inspected the voting equipment at county offices. Based on concerns related to election security and proprietary information, Elsenheimer had placed a protective order over the findings, "restricting use, distribution or manipulation of the forensic images and/or other information gleaned" without first getting his approval. The judge lifted that order Monday after state and county attorneys withdrew their objections.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]The report concludes Antrim County's results should not have been certified, and because Dominion Voting Systems equipment is used in most Michigan counties, statewide results should not have been certified, either.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Trump on Monday afternoon tweeted a Free Press story about the pending release of the report, calling it an "election changing result."

<...>
[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]n a joint statement, Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson and Attorney General Dana Nessel said ASOG "has no apparent expertise in election administration and technology," and its work appears "limited to the previous release and amplification of other false information and fake documents."[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Nessel said it is common for parties in a case to hire a consultant who will support their desired conclusion. "It’s why we give the other parties in a lawsuit a chance to depose the expert and challenge their qualifications in court,” which did not happen in this case, Nessel said.[/FONT]

[LRRPF52]

Numerous States have banned the use of Dominion machines due to the machine architecture being specifically designed to support back-door access, real-time online monitoring by unidentified off-site entities, and susceptibility to admin authority to change votes.

Furthermore, the fact that Dominion machines are foreign-owned by a Canadian firm, who uses a US HQ to loophole around that issue, should be an exclusionary baseline as it is.

The whole “vote-by-machine” medium always raised red flags with me.

There should be vote-in-person with verified photo ID and unique identifier marks for each voter.

Maybe we could 3D-print our own individual encoded stamps that we would mark our ballots with, because right now, I have zero faith in election integrity.

Before all of this, Texas evaluated Dominion machines and software and rejected them since there were so many deficiencies and glaring problems with them, that did not come close to meeting Texas State law requirements.

Here’s a 2019 analysis of Dominion and their Democracy 5.5 system. January 2019 analysis of Dominion Machines and Software

What I would recommend to everyone is to not source any claims or disinformation from the usual suspect corporate presstitute brothels, who recycle the aborted detritus from their masters and dish it out as if it’s legitimate information regarding pretty much any subject.

If you see a site that has “fact-check” or “widely discredited” in its headlines or article intro, you pretty much know it’s BS.

It would be good to have relevancy-based search engine algorithms that exclude all of the corporate media whores so that none of their lies feed into your information stream.