The ruling for the constitutionality of openly carrying a firearm in public comes a week to the day after a Ninth Circuit panel upheld the ruling which blocked Californias high capacity magazine ban.
montana Wrote:The ruling for the constitutionality of openly carrying a firearm in public comes a week to the day after a Ninth Circuit panel upheld the ruling which blocked California’s “high capacity” magazine ban.
Yes. Making us hide our firearms from plain sight is a tool that "they" use to to shame and control us. As if we are a small group of abarent perverts! It was only when the homosexuals, pot smokers and socialist came out of their respective closets in numbers and were seen in public as "real people" that they got respect..and political power. When honest everyday hard working people cary openly in great numgers, everywhere, we will loose the stigma that the Left is putting on us.
As an aside, my 22y/o daughter brought home a boy for us to meet. From the city. He had never held a gun befroe. I introduced him to the guns my daughter keeps in her room. A KSG, AR (g) carbine, AR Pistol (g) Walther PPQ and and a Walther ppk for carry. I showed him her bug out bag with MK17 gas mask, shellplate and carrier and geiger counter PVS 14. He keeps comming back... so it's apearent to me that even college students can have a open mind iif they want to.
07-29-2018, 10:36 PM (This post was last modified: 07-29-2018, 10:39 PM by PAsasquatch.)
I was a college student about 10 years ago. I kept an AK74 under my bed in the house that i lived in with 5 other people. None of them were bothered by it. That Drift is a rough generalization of college students. I believe the only reason more college students don't exercise their 2nd amendment rights is that having a firearm on campus is frowned upon by several very tough laws.
That being said; I am glad that the 9th Circuit Court found the part of the Constitution that says "Shall not be infringed" and read it.
"...the split panel decision might not represent the final word in the case. It could still be reversed by the en banc court, as was a previous pro-carry panel decision written by Judge O’Scannlain."
stanc Wrote:"...the split panel decision might not represent the final word in the case. It could still be reversed by the en banc court, as was a previous pro-carry panel decision written by Judge OScannlain."
Quote:Nevertheless, the anti-gun wing of the Ninth Circuit has few maneuvers left to continue to deny the constitutional right to bear firearms in public. It would either have to be the first circuit to declare there was no such right at all or decide that a right the Constitution ascribes to the people applies only to a hand-selected few. So far, even the dominant liberal contingent of the Ninth Circuit has been unable to muster a majority opinion for either proposition.
Seems to describe just how the next assault on the 2A will take form.
If it's true that we are here to help others, then what exactly are the others here for?
