Stan have you seen the new IMI armor piercing ammo? Doesn’t give much information.
http://www.imisystems.com/wp-content/upl..._Final.pdf
http://www.imisystems.com/wp-content/upl..._Final.pdf
|
New Cartridge Developments and Implications for Dismounted Infantry Soldiers
|
|
Stan have you seen the new IMI armor piercing ammo? Doesn’t give much information.
http://www.imisystems.com/wp-content/upl..._Final.pdf
05-01-2018, 03:23 PM
Why not keep improved 5.56 for magazine fed weapons? It seems most problems with it have been fixed. Like LRRP52 I think machine guns are the major problem. What about a light, constant recoil machine gun using 140 gr steel and aluminum long bullets? Combined with light cases and fairly high speeds ,how would it perform?
05-01-2018, 03:49 PM
VASCAR2 Wrote:Stan have you seen the new IMI amour piercing ammo? Doesnt give much information.It sure doesn't. When I saw that IMI publicity sheet a few months ago, I searched for more info, but found nothing.
05-01-2018, 04:06 PM
hill37 Wrote:Why not keep improved 5.56 for magazine fed weapons? It seems most problems with it have been fixed. Like LRRP52 I think machine guns are the major problem.I agree. hill37 Wrote:What about a light, constant recoil machine gun using 140 gr steel and aluminum long bullets? Combined with light cases and fairly high speeds ,how would it perform?Beats me. The only thing close that comes to mind are the long, aluminum-core projectiles developed at CETME around 60 years ago, but I've never seen any performance info.
05-01-2018, 06:10 PM
I tried to calculate the bc of a 30 cal 140 grain bullet with the form factor of the 200 gr match king. but my algebra has left me.
05-04-2018, 02:37 AM
A new(?) face in the poly case fray? http://www.truevelocityinc.com/industries/
10-05-2018, 08:33 PM
Looks like the Army is going with 6.8mm for its Next Gen Squad Weapons: https://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2018...d-weapons/
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|