07-25-2018, 12:55 PM
JASmith Wrote:Bottom lin for me: The “Weapons of War” clause is a troubling additional and likely unconstitutional constraint on 2A rights.
Adding the clause for interpreting which weapons can be possessed by civilians sets a precedent for for further restrictions. All that is needed is another Federal official to declare that all firearms types can be and have been used for warfare and...
I understand your concern Jay and agree to a point. The US is already using the "sporting use" clause and is furthering firearm bans to include semi autos in many states because of it. What this case does is stop the huge push back that has been occurring in many communist states like california regarding semi auto rifles with an arguable court case. The only way we restore our real gun rights is with a pro majority 2A supreme court hearing a case nullifying the NFA act "infringement clause" and establishing a correct reading of the 2A. If this case proves to be a win or boondoggle, time will only tell.