Feds admit in court that AR-15's are not weapons of war

[stanc]

I am wondering what everyone is getting out of this article.

I think it's that some here are so desperate for a 2A "win" that wishful thinking causes them to see it as more than it really is: a 1A win with negligible impact on 2A rights.

All I am seeing is a good way to justify outlawing "higher" capacity magazines, recoil comps, bipods, pistol grips, foregrips, and certain optics. Am I missing something?

It certainly classifies the 60-rd, 90-rd, 100-rd, and 150-rd magazines on the market as "military equipment," leaving them vulnerable. I'm not sure about those other items.