07-31-2018, 07:58 PM
41bear Wrote:I presume this is what we are talking about:The OP didn't bother to say, but yes, that appears to be the subject of the discussion.
http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/local-...took-effec
(And your link doesn't work. Please add the letter "t" at the end, so "effec" is "effect")
41bear Wrote:While I applaud the intent to keep weapons out of the hands of sick (mental illness) people to base it on speech only is a dangerous road to go down and as the lawyer pointed out it's unconstitutional. Looks like a knee jerker to me and as usual not well thought out.I doubt that it is possible to craft a law intended to prevent mass shootings which won't adversely affect someone's rights.
