06-07-2019, 03:32 PM
keystone183 Wrote:lr:
Its obvious you take personal offense to whatever you deem as slights to the president. Got it. I'm not sure how you can any way confuse the purpose of this thread. A president with a track record of infringing on gun rights now speaks poorly of silencers. WHY WOULD ANYBODY NOT BE CONCERNED???!??!?!?!?!?! Of course this was to inform!!!!!!! And again, LRRP's coverage of the legality was thorough, but when has legality stopped presidents before?? Perhaps you aren't reading all my posts, or do you not acknowledge that legislation isn't needed to seriously impact the acquisition of suppressors, or sbr's, or binary triggers, or hell triggers with a short reset?
Again, i certainly HOPE he doesn't care much about them, but I encourage everyone to use that link i posted to make sure they get the message! Hope is a poor strategy!
Keystone:
I did not critique your post where you said you did not believe President Trump understood the 2A. Why didn't I come down on you? Because it was a civil criticism and not a rant.
Once again, I have no problem with civil criticism. Evidence is that I did not comment on your assertion that Trump doesn't know much about the 2A. I do have problems with guys going on rants because they don't like Trump. I did not tolerate insults to Obama and won't to Trump. Civil criticism -- absolutely. Insulting and mostly vulgar rants about Trump or any other President -- negative.
Back to your post. Your original post called the people who work for Trump 'lackeys'. And now you expect those 'lackeys' to respect your opinion?
Yes, you are correct that guys who care about silencers need to pay attention and to get involved. Being forceful and not giving ground usually wins.
My view is that this will die.
LR55