China has a problem with assault knives

[montana]

Apparently you miunderstood my question. I asked what kind of emotional pictures would you produce that could effectively counter video and photos of mass shooting victims, not what dry statistics and news reports you would link to.

What did you want, the would be victims and family members walking over the criminals dead bodies ?? The stories of would be victims that used firearms to stop the bad guys and the photos of the dead victims of regimes who banned guns was insufficient for you??

And why on earth did you link to so many copies of the same two home invasion stories??? One of each would've been sufficient.

Is there a rule of only one??

Hey, it's not our fault that some of the "information" you link to contains significant flaws or errors.

Remember opinions...

Says the guy who posts an article which supports the anti-gun talking point that a gun ban would prevent mass shootings and save lives.

Yes, I do acknowledge the oppositions opinion. Is that a bad thing?? There are two sides to that story, funny how you focused only on the oppositions.

Not only did you take that remark out of context, it was part of a response to LR55, not you.

LR55 had nothing to do with what I stated from my observation of you.

And BTW, in another of your threads, I did offer a suggestion for a pro-gun "solution" to the problem of mass shootings, to which you were strangely silent:
http://www.65grendel.com/forum/showthrea...post237617

How is government soldiers carrying m-4 rifles pro gun???

Pro Gun definition:
: favoring the right of civilians to own guns and opposing legislation restricting this right.

He reminds me of the Republican gun guy who claims to be pro-2A, but advocates a law requiring people to get government-mandated training in order to buy and own firearms, in effect implementing government licensing of gun owners.

Nice try Stan, "but once again" no cigar. "I stated, "if we (had) to have,("not I want to have") restrictions" I would rather they require training for individuals and be allowed to (own and carry any firearm) but could never pass a firearm register law. Now explain to me about your logic where all of your anger and energy is completely focused on one guy, but never the yahoos running for president who would completely ban every firearm except single shot muskets. Your complaints about the pres are legit, but you never direct that focus on the much bigger potential threat from the opposition, why??