China has a problem with assault knives

[stanc]

Roger but this is a pro gun forum so when someone comes across as being anti gun or anti 2A, there will be fire.

In Stan's case, he has been here since this started due to his profession as a firearms historian and the place where the Grendel fits in as a intermediate cartridge.

Doesn't necessarily mean he believes the 2A guarantees our right to keep and bear arms. And he doesn't.

Kinda, sorta, but not exactly.

What I've said is that the purpose of the 2A was to guarantee that members of State militias would have access to standard military weapons. Since the old State militia system was abandoned long ago, the original purpose is no longer relevant.

However, as written, the 2A does not specify that only military weapons are protected, so in theory, the 2A should guarantee the right to keep and bear all types of arms. In reality, it does not. And indeed, most "pro-2A" people do not want it to.

Stan has never agreed with any pro gun opinion on this forum that I can recall.

What??? Why, in this very thread I agreed with montana that the 2A was not about hunting or sporting guns.

He has never to my recollection criticized a single Democrat for any sort of infringement on our rights and particularly those who vow to ban and confiscate all of our firearms.

I never saw any reason to. It would be redundant, voicing the same objections that everyone else has.

So if someone is going to post a pro 2A comment on the forum, expect Stan to disagree.

Depends on whether the comment is something I agree with or not. Contrary to popular opinion, I don't disagree with everything.