Concealed Carry Stops Mass Shooting in Church

[LRRPF52]

Why do the clothes the person who shot the assailant make any difference to your pro, or anti-gun argument?

What do you think the OP is saying? - He hasn't posted a single word.

What on earth are you trying to say?

It doesn't matter. No matter what the story is or any post regarding 2A, Stan will pop in and find a canard to make an argument directly in contradiction to the OP's headline.

The premise for the subtractively-argumentative position on this one is that since the uniformed security was wearing a uniform, then the OP's "Concealed Carry Stops Mass Shooting in Church" is invalid.

How much time did the first concealed carrier buy to help stop the animal from shooting more people?

Enough for the security guard to make a headshot on the scum-sucking dirtbag and blast his brain matter all over the wall, and go down DRT.

Even though the CCW took one for the team, he provided enough time for the security guard to end it quickly and prevent what could have been a significant body count.

CCW doesn't always mean you live, but that you minimize the loss of life among the innocent.

So to me, from everything I'm seeing about the story, an armed CCW carrier absolutely did help contribute to stopping a mass murder, even if they died in the process.

To jump into it and immediately knee-jerk into typical default arguments for argument's sake and pick apart the OP's thread title seems to have been done in haste, and further contributes to stirring up animosity among the forum.

Happy New Year...