01-02-2020, 04:10 PM
JASmith Wrote:Once again, Stan’s anti-gun rhetoric, inability to accept other’s opinions, and obsession with having the last word will cause another 2A thread to be locked.
I am sure that he will provide “examples” refuting every observation in the first sentence, and this will only prove the points made there.
Is this behavior really good for this forum?
Can we imagine much better would things be if Stan could make his often valuable counter-observations snd then allow other’s refutation to be given equal space without “Stan proving that he right all along” by using out of context quotes, etc.?
JAYSM try to understand , Stan is the only one that has the ability to think clearly and logically, we are only capable of knee-jerk emotional reactions. We do not have the incredible insight to understand what our own eyes see. Like clock work, we constantly embarrass our selves by miss interpreting life's events. The incredible way he knows exactly what the perp or victim was thinking. It is like he is psychic. I know it is unbelievable but true!
I understand, It can be painful for many of us, "but a necessity" if we are to grow. Though he is falsely accused over and over, he martyrs on for the sake of this forum. He has been a stanch defender of the 2ndA, "yet continually gets accused of being anti-gun" a tragedy beyond words. I for one appreciate Stan, "for I know in my heart of hearts" he struggles on for the betterment of us all.