stanc Wrote:Well, that is what you often do. This thread is a good example. Good guy kills bad guy, and your emotional reflex is to automatically see it as "good guy stops mass shooting" even though you don't know if a mass shooting had actually been stopped.
And, you completely ignore -- or fail to see -- possibilities that are contrary to your narrative, such as the idea (which even Klem agreed could be the case) that the perp in this incident may have been in the church to intimidate or rob people, and might not have shot anyone if the CCW hadn't drawn his gun.
All joking aside Stan, you once again take the narrative of the anti-gun media and politicians. This reflects the thinking of Saul Alinsky, who wrote ?Rules for Radicals,Never let a good crisis go to waste. If a mad dog goes into a gun free zone and slaughters many people, it proves guns need to be banned or heavily regulated. If a gun man is stopped, "by a good guy with a gun in a crowded place" there is no way to prove it stopped a mass shooting and should be down played and dismissed.https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/me...9Hsmi-jjE0 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CJG4MHuuh3g https://defensemaven.io/bluelivesmatter/...LPJJS7kThe nut job pulled a shotgun out of his coat and pointed it at an elderly man, which triggered the response of the closest member of the security detail. The piece of trash never hesitated and shot him at point blank range and then, "with out hesitation" proceeded to shoot the un-armed man who posed no threat. The evil POS then quickly moved to the front centre of the church, "with the shot gun poised for more shooting" and was quickly terminated by the instructor of the security detail. But from this wisdom, we should accept the possibility the POS was only going to rob and intimidate the people after he,"with out any mercy or hesitation" blasted an un-armed deacon, "who posed no threat to him"???? Your logic follows those of a battered wife, making excuses for her abusive husband.