stanc Wrote:I don't know if any of them are.
Yes. I only made the comment about Reagan because grayfox compared Trump to Reagan, and I was responding to statements in grayfox's post.
-------------------------------------------------------
LOL. The 1934 National Firearms Act, the 1986 machine gun ban, and other Federal laws have made "shall not be infringed" not worth the parchment it was written on.
Sure, according to the 2A, the people still have a (considerably infringed) right to keep and bear arms, but that is a different subject.
The issue I addressed is your statement that you see "a realistic limit to what arms a militia-level citizen should be expected to show up with."
Members of the militia are defined by Federal law, not the 2A. Since they are expected to show up with no weapons, your "realistic limit" would be set at ZERO. No weapons of any kind.
The "mandate" is: If you criticize Trump for something he said about the 2A, you will name one or more of the Democratic candidates who you think are stronger supporters of the 2A.
I have not criticized Trump in this thread, therefore I am not required to name any Democrat who is more pro-2A than Trump.
Stan:
Of course you didn't criticize Trump in this thread. Only pointed out all the anti gun things he has said and done in the past.
I also expected you to dodge the question by saying something like you 'don't know' if any of the Democrat Presidential candidates are more pro-gun than Trump. Really? You expect us to believe you know so much about why we have no 2A rights yet know nothing about the platform of the Democrats?
Your leftist arrogance and obfuscation does not play well on a pro gun forum.
Disobeying my intent for this single thread was predicted.
I am banning you from the forum for one month, not three.
LR55