12-06-2021, 01:25 PM
jasper2408 Wrote:The case was about whether the military(Federal government) had the right to declare martial law and suspend habeas corpus in a state that was not under seige while the state courts were intact. What was decided was that the government could not just make up emergencies to suit their needs. The guy was guilty as sin and the military sentenced him to hang but the SCOTUS overruled his verdict as unconstitutional and he was released. Whether the state recharged him or not I do not know.
All of the text that you are claiming not to be from the document at the beginning of the clip are in the SCOTUS document that I referenced, which is the actual text from the court decision and is over 140 pages long. My quote was from pages 136-137 of the ruling. Maybe the people on Facebook should do more research so they can actually know what they are talking about.
HKG:
How about going into this and citing the parts that support your argument?
The last paragraph seems to support Jasper very clearly.
LR-55