05-06-2011, 09:30 PM
LR1955
I believe we're interested in the same objective.
Absent a definitive summary of what is and is not allowed by the conventions, we fall prey to continuing speculation about "what if the bullet could..."
Tony's challenge is presenting a cartridge concept that will provide the desired effectiveness under the rules his nation is obliged to work under.
I see way too many references to US practice, including egregious extensions of that practice, in a thread motivated by UK and European needs.
So, the request for a more or less definitive summary is an attempt to keep the thread on track.
JASmith
I believe we're interested in the same objective.
Absent a definitive summary of what is and is not allowed by the conventions, we fall prey to continuing speculation about "what if the bullet could..."
Tony's challenge is presenting a cartridge concept that will provide the desired effectiveness under the rules his nation is obliged to work under.
I see way too many references to US practice, including egregious extensions of that practice, in a thread motivated by UK and European needs.
So, the request for a more or less definitive summary is an attempt to keep the thread on track.
JASmith
