Army Carbine Program
#8
The SCAR trashes optics, and most SF units have sent them back-don't want them. It also isn't any more reliable than an M4 according to the guys that use them in high volume.

The HK416 is way front heavy, had a stupid magazine well that prevents use with other mags that are common across the system, and isn't any more reliable.

The ACR is way front heavy.

I like the Colt Monolithic Carbine-just wish it had a longer handguard. There isn't really anything wrong with the M4 as a standard issue service carbine. They need to standardize the Designated Marksman Rifle and work on a new viable, lightweight LMG that doesn't suck like the SAW, that is chambered in something that cuts the mustard. When you see SF guys preferring the M4 over a lot of the new 5.56 systems, but are needing something with more power/energy at distance, but is lightweight without being an optics-destroyer (SCAR-H), there is a void, and that void is the DM Carbine system.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Army Carbine Program - by Michael - 03-20-2013, 12:33 PM
Army Carbine Program - by cory - 03-20-2013, 03:45 PM
Army Carbine Program - by Guardsman26 - 03-20-2013, 05:42 PM
Army Carbine Program - by LRRPF52 - 03-20-2013, 07:30 PM
Army Carbine Program - by Michael - 03-20-2013, 07:58 PM
Army Carbine Program - by bwaites - 03-20-2013, 08:08 PM
Army Carbine Program - by stanc - 04-02-2013, 09:05 PM
Army Carbine Program - by LRRPF52 - 04-02-2013, 10:07 PM
Army Carbine Program - by montana - 04-02-2013, 11:25 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)