Troops left to fend for themselves after Army was warned of flaws in M4 rifle

[LRRPF52]

And since 1873 we have not had a new cartridge without a new rifle.

Uh, how about first we do a proper test and evaluation?

That's the one thing that bugs me about Grendel and GPC proponents. They argue for their pet cartridge to replace the NATO rounds, but don't bother doing the testing necessary to determine if either round actually has the necessary performance.

Uh, how about first we do a proper test and evaluation?

That's the one thing that bugs me about Grendel and GPC proponents. They argue for their pet cartridge to replace the NATO rounds, but don't bother doing the testing necessary to determine if either round actually has the necessary performance.

Good points. I already know what the operational T&E of loading down 50-60% of your personnel with a heavier load, with less ammunition-per pound looks like.

RTO
PL
PSG
FO
TAC-P
Combat Medic
Ammo Bearer
Assistant Gunner
Anti-Armor Weapon Specialist
Scout Observer
Senior Scout
Scout RTO
Scout PL
Scout PSG
Scout RTO
Scout Team Leader
Scout ATL

True or false, it's a great idea to issue a heavier weapon with heavier ammo for the above soldiers? It makes perfect logistical and tactical sense.