New Army "Caliber Configuration Study"

[JASmith]

It appears to me, gentlemen, that there seems to be an element of naysaying based on thinking that "exceptions are the rule", rather than understanding that all rules have exceptions. From a grander sense, the tactics and scenarios being discussed are for the average conflict and engagement. What must be understood is that, regardless of the weapons deployed, the tactics employed and the logistics involved, there never be the perfect load out for every situation.

Having seen that, can we stop nitpicking on every point, and see the bigger picture, here? It is well understood that there is an abundance of information available from which one may pick and choose to score points, but doing so does not invalidate the opposing viewpoint. Rather, it shows (at least to me) a narrow viewpoint, which does the writer no justice or this discussion any service.

Well said!

Constant repetition of the narrow viewpoint with cherry-picked examples indeed do not help the larger discussion.