Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Feds admit in court that AR-15's are not weapons of war
#41
(3) Accessories or attachments specifically designed to automatically stabilize aim (other than gun rests) or for automatic targeting, and specifically designed parts and components therefor.

Wouldn't the recoil comps, bipods, and certain optics fall into this category?
Reply
#42
PAsasquatch Wrote:(3) Accessories or attachments specifically designed to automatically stabilize aim (other than gun rests) or for automatic targeting, and specifically designed parts and components therefor.

Wouldn't the recoil comps, bipods, and certain optics fall into this category?
It looks to me like bipods would be excluded for being gun rests.
Compensators do not stabilize aiming, so would also be excluded.
Certain optics would definitely fall into the category. For instance:

[video=youtube;yGh1jB2ffiI]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yGh1jB2ffiI[/video]
Reply
#43
A US district judge has temporarily blocked Cody Wilson from uploading 3D gun design files online.

https://www.pcmag.com/news/362785/states...d-gun-file

Trump tweets:
Quote:I am looking into 3-D Plastic Guns being sold to the public.
Already spoke to NRA, doesn't seem to make much sense!
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)