In response to LR-52 recommendations, I got some 129's for testing out of my 18" Grendel.
I spent a range session today doing some initial velocity tests for the 129 SST and 129 ABLR.
I'm doing this to sort of scope-out what to expect from my barrel for these, before I get to more serious load laddering.
The conditions were average for my indoor 100 yd range here in NOVA. I used 1x Hornady brass, cci450 primers, loading both sets to 2.260 after verifying they will fit ok in the chamber.
I'm loading 1 round apiece for CFE-223 of 29.8, 30.0, 30.2, 30.4, and 30.6 of each bullet. Once I have an idea what to expect I will commence some ladder and accuracy tests for each one. If I can get an accurate node somewhere 2380-2400 ft/sec then I can see using them possibly this fall in CO at 8500 +/- ft. I doubt if there is a node higher than this that I can reach, which is ok.
Anyway, I have a pic of the data and of a graph along side, I also added a linear estimate b/c I don't expect to go higher than the listed 30.6... (idk maybe for the sst, Hornady lists up to 31.7 but the book velocities are slower than what I got today...)
I also have pix of the POIs for each set of 5, I don't know if the impact points tell me anything or not since it is a limited dataset, but I have 'em anyway. They are labeled 1-5 in order of increasing powder load.
Testing was at 100 yds.
Now to attach the pix.
65Grendel-A-129-tests.jpg
20170702_202151.jpg
20170702_202314.jpg
I spent a range session today doing some initial velocity tests for the 129 SST and 129 ABLR.
I'm doing this to sort of scope-out what to expect from my barrel for these, before I get to more serious load laddering.
The conditions were average for my indoor 100 yd range here in NOVA. I used 1x Hornady brass, cci450 primers, loading both sets to 2.260 after verifying they will fit ok in the chamber.
I'm loading 1 round apiece for CFE-223 of 29.8, 30.0, 30.2, 30.4, and 30.6 of each bullet. Once I have an idea what to expect I will commence some ladder and accuracy tests for each one. If I can get an accurate node somewhere 2380-2400 ft/sec then I can see using them possibly this fall in CO at 8500 +/- ft. I doubt if there is a node higher than this that I can reach, which is ok.
Anyway, I have a pic of the data and of a graph along side, I also added a linear estimate b/c I don't expect to go higher than the listed 30.6... (idk maybe for the sst, Hornady lists up to 31.7 but the book velocities are slower than what I got today...)
I also have pix of the POIs for each set of 5, I don't know if the impact points tell me anything or not since it is a limited dataset, but I have 'em anyway. They are labeled 1-5 in order of increasing powder load.
Testing was at 100 yds.
Now to attach the pix.
65Grendel-A-129-tests.jpg
20170702_202151.jpg
20170702_202314.jpg
Comment