Wow,I can't believe how quickly this is moving along.Lots of good ideas and input here.Very interesting indeed!
Need New Bullets for 65G!
Collapse
X
-
Yeah, I'm really liking this........... and copper-solid is a nice way to start....... guess deep down I yearn for a bonded core.......
But I'm still a fan - learning a lot too.
BFT great idea to get this ball rolling."Down the floor, out the door, Go Brandon Go!!!!!"
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by grayfox View PostBFT:
I'm reading what BFT wrote, and for the record I don't have any personal experience in this, just learn from what's already out there. In the Grendel Handbook vol 2 (p. 49) it seems to suggest otherwise for the 100 gr ttsx, ie, at higher velocities there is more expansion, up to 2x more than the lowest in the table and rather linear with velocity. Plus, I'm thinking that Barnes et al may have some good reasons for the tip sizes they chose...
Just my thoughts of course...
For economy sake what MakerB says, makes some sense..."I rarely give a definite answer" - TG
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Troutguide View PostI think this is more of a minimum expansion threshold issue than anything. Thats why we are asking for a bullet designed for the Grendel velocities with low end expansion in mind. The 100 TTSX is designed to be pushed much faster as far as i can tell, or used at shorter ranges. If they are going to maximize the potential range of a bullet they might as well design it to expand way out there."Down the floor, out the door, Go Brandon Go!!!!!"
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Makerbullets View PostThis should give you expansion close to 750 yds (1600 fps). We have a window of about 800 - 1200fps, depending on a number of factors, that we can shift around in the velocity range. Look it over...
The 100 TTSX is listed a 2000 min opening at about 350yd in the LFP thread.Last edited by Troutguide; 12-12-2017, 12:46 AM."I rarely give a definite answer" - TG
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by grayfox View PostGood point. Did we say back there anything about a min opening velocity? If not, then how about ~1500-1600 so we take advantage of the Grrr. Probably too much to ask for 1300 like the ABLR...
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by LR1955 View PostRandy:
A .264 diameter round ball weighs around 30 grains. A 100 grain, 6.5mm cast bullet would be around 3/4 inch, be a flat base, and have about a 4 ogive.
That's why the 6.5 mm molds you see are in the 140 plus grain weights.
LR55
And why are the molds all in the 140g+ range?"In any war, political or battlefield; truth is the first casualty."
Trump has never had a wife he didn't cheat on.
Comment
-
-
Lead is so dense that in a cast bullet you can only get a 100 gr bullet to those specs if you make any larger than 3/4 inch it will be heavier. Thats why you need an alloy or copper to reduce total density. Think about a 22LR bullet at 40 gr how big would two and a half of those be melted together? Not a full size 6.5 bullet.Last edited by Troutguide; 12-12-2017, 02:28 AM."I rarely give a definite answer" - TG
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Troutguide View PostLead is so dense that in a cast bullet you can only get a 100 gr bullet to those specs if you make any larger than 3/4 inch it will be heavier. Thats why you need an alloy or copper to reduce total density. Think about a 22LR bullet at 40 gr how big would two and a half of those be melted together? Not a full size 6.5 bullet.
There is a 125g mold available but I'd prefer lighter than that.
I'm wanting plinking bullets but would like them to be relatively accurate out to 300-500 yards? Possible?
Hard cast with a small amount of tin and antimony. Powder coated for velocities up to 2500fps.
Custom molds are expensive and I will have to learn a lot about bullet design before I spent the money.
I love the idea though, when even the cheapest (on sale) jacketed factory .264 bullets are 20-25 cents each.
I'm not set up yet but will cast 9mm and .224 bullets first."In any war, political or battlefield; truth is the first casualty."
Trump has never had a wife he didn't cheat on.
Comment
-
-
N.O.E. has 125gr and up for the 6.5s and they have one much smaller 54gr at http://noebulletmolds.com/NV/index.p...4oil35l20ljji4
Not sure if link will work, I though Ranch Dog had one smaller but could be wrong, he likes heavy bullets with a large meplat as they work so well on game. Ranch Dog retired a few years ago but some of his designs are available at N.O.E. and Lee
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by kmon View PostN.O.E. has 125gr and up for the 6.5s and they have one much smaller 54gr at http://noebulletmolds.com/NV/index.p...4oil35l20ljji4
I wonder if that 126g could be shortened by taking out a section from the middle (area within the .250"). Then possibly a little off the back end to decrease the bearing surface.
N.O.E._Bullet_Moulds_266-125-FN C.jpg
Any cast bullet design more than a couple of years old has lube grooves that aren't necessary for coated bullets, another area for experimentation.
Edit: Actually, I'd like to see a copy of a 100g HPBT jacketed bullet (with a flatter, shorter nose to facilitate casting).Last edited by Randy99CL; 12-12-2017, 06:06 AM."In any war, political or battlefield; truth is the first casualty."
Trump has never had a wife he didn't cheat on.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Randy99CL View PostThanks, yes I was aware of the NOE molds and I will very likely buy their 5-cavity 126g.
I wonder if that 126g could be shortened by taking out a section from the middle (area within the .250"). Then possibly a little off the back end to decrease the bearing surface.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]10423[/ATTACH]
Any cast bullet design more than a couple of years old has lube grooves that aren't necessary for coated bullets, another area for experimentation.
Edit: Actually, I'd like to see a copy of a 100g HPBT jacketed bullet (with a flatter, shorter nose to facilitate casting).
Comment
-
-
Comment