nosler 90g varmageddon load data

[sbowhuntr]

Nosler has released load data for the 6.5 grendel and creedmoor for the 90g varmageddon offerings. An extensive list of suitable powders for both, looks to be H-335 is still producing the highest velocities in the grendel.

[VASCAR2]

Here is a link, thanks for the heads up!

https://load-data.nosler.com/load-data/65-grendel/

[Lemonaid]

Nosler has released load data for the 6.5 grendel and creedmoor for the 90g varmageddon offerings. An extensive list of suitable powders for both, looks to be H-335 is still producing the highest velocities in the grendel.

Er, it looks to me that 8208 had the highest max velocity listed on the Nosler site.

[A5BLASTER]

Er, it looks to me that 8208 had the highest max velocity listed on the Nosler site.

I will get you 100 bucks that real world max charge with that bullet and h335 will end up being the highest for speed and being much higher then nosler watered down data.

[sbowhuntr]

Agreed A5BLASTER... 335 imo is the go to powder for light bullets in the grendel. I've tried 8208 in a few rifles and am not impressed at all.. It's my last choice in an extensive powder line up for the grendel or anything else to be honest..

[Lemonaid]

I will get you 100 bucks that real world max charge with that bullet and h335 will end up being the highest for speed and being much higher then nosler watered down data.

Would you clarify what real world max charge is?
My take on that would be working up from the minimum charge until either Max Published velocity is reached or stopped early because of pressure signs on the brass?
So, 8208 will give pressure signs at a velocity that is lower than when H335 gives pressure signs but both are under max published loads?
Or do you mean the accuracy node will be at a higher velocity for H335 than the one for 8208?

[A5BLASTER]

Would you clarify what real world max charge is?
My take on that would be working up from the minimum charge until either Max Published velocity is reached or stopped early because of pressure signs on the brass?
So, 8208 will give pressure signs at a velocity that is lower than when H335 gives pressure signs but both are under max published loads?
Or do you mean the accuracy node will be at a higher velocity for H335 than the one for 8208?

What I mean is when guys start loading this bullet. H335 will give more speed to the accuracy node and at max load then 8208 will.

H335 has been proven on several bullets in the 100 and less range to give the most speed. Now I'm sure somebody's rifle will like 8208 better but I bet the majority will find h335 will give faster speeds at the accuracy node and faster speeds at the max load and probably be higher then nosler data as well.

[Lemonaid]

What I mean is when guys start loading this bullet. H335 will give more speed to the accuracy node and at max load then 8208 will.

H335 has been proven on several bullets in the 100 and less range to give the most speed. Now I'm sure somebody's rifle will like 8208 better but I bet the majority will find h335 will give faster speeds at the accuracy node and faster speeds at the max load and probably be higher then nosler data as well.

Thank you for explaining! Clarity is achieved! As I have no experience with H335 (yet) in the Grendel this is valuable information for me.