Thanks for giving this a go, Oh Brave Leader! I decided to pass on buying the 4166, because it just didn't seem like it would offer enough advantage to have one more "orphan" can of powder around that only had a few hundred grains used up before I realized it would not best loads I had already developed. BUT -I certainly learned something - that compressed loads would have enough force to drive the bullet back out. Are you loading with low neck tension? I need to go and recheck some loads I made up tonight, because of what I encountered.
I was loading up some 165 gr SSTs and GMXs in my 30-06 tonight and the GMXs, being much longer than the SSTs are "crunching" the powder at the same grain weight that is non-compressed with the SST. I couldn't get the GMX to seat as deep as the SST, despite them having the same ogive to cannelure distance and recommended COL. Since my '06 is a semi-auto, I have to respect the COL limit and turned down my seating die .004 to match the same COL on the SSTs. Now with the info about the possibility of the bullet being being pushed out I am going to have to recheck my COL on the GMXs.
Oddly enough, Hornady shows the SAME 30-06 loads for the 165 GMX, 165 SST and 168 gr AMAX and BTHP. I am 1.2 grains below Hornady's Maximum for H4350, but 2.4 grains above Hodgdon's maximum for the 165 gr. GMX. I wondered why there was such a big difference between the Hornady and Hodgdon max loads, but now I realize the GMX would be a VERY compressed load at Hornady's max of 58.9 gr. Makes me wonder if Hornady even did any testing, or if they just took the "same weight bullet = same powder charge" approach.
I have not yet loaded any 120 gr. GMXs in my Grendel to be able to compare against the 123 AMAX, but the speculation is that Hornady set the max charge for CFE based on the GMX, because most of us have safely loaded a bit hotter than published with the AMAX. Yet, Hornady seems to have taken the opposite approach with the 30-06 loads, developing the load based on the SST bullet and assuming the longer GMX would be fine. It goes to show the importance of working up your own loads, starting well below max and carefully watching for pressure - EVEN when working from published manuals.
Anyway, NF - good luck with your tests with 4166 tomorrow, I am interested to see the results.
I was loading up some 165 gr SSTs and GMXs in my 30-06 tonight and the GMXs, being much longer than the SSTs are "crunching" the powder at the same grain weight that is non-compressed with the SST. I couldn't get the GMX to seat as deep as the SST, despite them having the same ogive to cannelure distance and recommended COL. Since my '06 is a semi-auto, I have to respect the COL limit and turned down my seating die .004 to match the same COL on the SSTs. Now with the info about the possibility of the bullet being being pushed out I am going to have to recheck my COL on the GMXs.
Oddly enough, Hornady shows the SAME 30-06 loads for the 165 GMX, 165 SST and 168 gr AMAX and BTHP. I am 1.2 grains below Hornady's Maximum for H4350, but 2.4 grains above Hodgdon's maximum for the 165 gr. GMX. I wondered why there was such a big difference between the Hornady and Hodgdon max loads, but now I realize the GMX would be a VERY compressed load at Hornady's max of 58.9 gr. Makes me wonder if Hornady even did any testing, or if they just took the "same weight bullet = same powder charge" approach.
I have not yet loaded any 120 gr. GMXs in my Grendel to be able to compare against the 123 AMAX, but the speculation is that Hornady set the max charge for CFE based on the GMX, because most of us have safely loaded a bit hotter than published with the AMAX. Yet, Hornady seems to have taken the opposite approach with the 30-06 loads, developing the load based on the SST bullet and assuming the longer GMX would be fine. It goes to show the importance of working up your own loads, starting well below max and carefully watching for pressure - EVEN when working from published manuals.
Anyway, NF - good luck with your tests with 4166 tomorrow, I am interested to see the results.
Comment