Some say yea and some say nay....what say ye?
Hornady black ELD match for deer hunting?
Collapse
X
-
Shoot into water at about 5 yards, recover the bullet.
Then decide.
Water tends to exaggerate expansion compared to bullet
performance in flesh, so it will be a solid test.[URL="http://shootersnotes.com/"]shootersnotes.com[/URL]
"To those who have fought and almost died for it, freedom has a flavor the protected will never know."
-- Author Unknown
"If at first you do succeed, try not to look astonished!" -- Milton Berle
-
-
I've used them with good success and plan on using them again this season. This one was 230 yards if I remember correctly.
65 grendel buck.jpgAttached FilesEngineer, FFL and Pastor
Comment
-
-
Looks a lot like recovered 123 gr SST bullets launched by Grendels.[URL="http://shootersnotes.com/"]shootersnotes.com[/URL]
"To those who have fought and almost died for it, freedom has a flavor the protected will never know."
-- Author Unknown
"If at first you do succeed, try not to look astonished!" -- Milton Berle
Comment
-
-
I've never seen Hornady officially refer to the eld-m as a hunting round. The eld-x yes...Originally posted by Steelpanther02 View PostNice. So obviously shot placement is key but being match grade the fine print on the hornady website says they are also a hunting round. I'm just wondering if they have the same expansion as a regular hunting round?
Comment
-
-
The ELD isn't just "an a-max with a diff. tip".. from what I understand they made changes to the design a little, for example compare the 155gr .30cal amax and the same bullet weight and caliber in the eld-m, the same with the 168gr. They have different BC's... https://www.hornady.com/bullets/rifle/#!/Originally posted by 1Shot View PostHornady stated that the A-Max bullet was suitable to be used as a think skin hunting bullet so If the ELD-M is really just the A-Max with a non melting tip then should it not also be a thin skin bullet?
That being said the ELD-M are supposed to be very similar in construction to the A-max
Here's a good thread about the ELD Match with some results you are looking for (in other calibers though) https://www.longrangehunting.com/thr...-a-max.180825/Last edited by imaguy3; 08-26-2018, 08:41 PM.
Comment
-
-
I killed two does last season, and the ELD-Ms performed admirably. Wound channels showed obvious expansion and cavitation damage, none of the bullets were recovered, 125ish and 145ish if I remember. Both expired ethically and without undue suffering. I will use them again, unless I find a better ABLR load.Nothing kills the incentive of men faster than a healthy sense of entitlement. Nothing kills entitlement faster than a healthy sense of achievement.
Comment
-
-
Not really a valid benchmark. You can put a fmj through the vitals and it will kill. You can do the same with .22 lr. round nose. The issue really isn't as simple as whether or not it will kill, but how effectively/quickly and as expounded upon above, how ethically.Originally posted by Bigs28 View PostPut it through the vitals and it will killKill a hog. Save the planet.
My videos - [url]https://www.youtube.com/user/HornHillRange[/url]
Comment
-
-
I should say that I would use the SSTs if they were more accurate in my rifles. The reason that I use the ELD-M is because (so far) they are the most consistent factory rounds that I have found for my personal rifles. I'm not saying that the SSTs are bad. Heck, in a pinch, even the Wolf ammo is accurate enough in my guns for most hunting shots in this area. Since the ELD-M is more accurate, that is what I prefer to use. In the attached image I wrote "129gr ELD" which what a brain fart on my part. It was the Hornady Black 123gr ELD-M. Each little square is 1/4" and this was just over the hood of my Jeep, not a real sophisticated set up.Engineer, FFL and Pastor
Comment
-
Comment