Has anyone done a comparison of the American and European chambers? Is there enough difference to matter? I know I could compare the drawings but I wouldn't know what I was looking at.
CIP vs SAAMI
Collapse
X
-
The folks at SAAMI and CIP worked very diligently to harmonize the two drawings about three years ago.[URL="http://shootersnotes.com/"]shootersnotes.com[/URL]
"To those who have fought and almost died for it, freedom has a flavor the protected will never know."
-- Author Unknown
"If at first you do succeed, try not to look astonished!" -- Milton Berle
Comment
-
-
CIP standards say Pmax for the Grendel is 4050 bars which is 58,740 psi. SAAMI's MAP is 52,000 psi. I have no idea why there's such a large difference.Originally posted by hill37 View PostOK Thanks. Do you know if the chamber pressure is close too? I was wondering if the European version has to be changed to be sold here.
My understanding is that CIP standards are mandatory for European manufacturers. SAAMI specs, on the other hand, are voluntary for US manufacturers. Some companies are members of SAAMI, others aren't.
Comment
-
-
I spent tens of minutes researching this, so I don't know how definitive my conclusions are.Originally posted by kmon View PostFrom the discussions of PPU ammo when it was being recalled there is a difference in the datum point and definition of headspace
CIP standards simply state "Headspace on Shoulder" while SAAMI chooses an arbitrary diameter of 0.35" located between the shoulder and neck to establish the headspace dimension. Since CIP and SAAMI are consistent on the length of the cartridge (and chamber) from base to shoulder and the shoulder angle is the same, I'd say that both are using the same headspace specification.
Comment
-
-
Here is a Grendel-centric explanation of SAAMI pressure standards: http://shootersnotes.com/articles/saami-pressure/Originally posted by Drillboss View PostCIP standards say Pmax for the Grendel is 4050 bars which is 58,740 psi. SAAMI's MAP is 52,000 psi. I have no idea why there's such a large difference.
My understanding is that CIP standards are mandatory for European manufacturers. SAAMI specs, on the other hand, are voluntary for US manufacturers. Some companies are members of SAAMI, others aren't.
My impression is that most US manufacturers load to pressures slightly below the SAAMI MAP to minimize product liability exposure.
The velocities we see in European and Russian Grendel ammunition might suggest they are even more aggressive about staying away from the ceiling.[URL="http://shootersnotes.com/"]shootersnotes.com[/URL]
"To those who have fought and almost died for it, freedom has a flavor the protected will never know."
-- Author Unknown
"If at first you do succeed, try not to look astonished!" -- Milton Berle
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by hill37 View PostThe 123gn load in PPU's catalog converts to about 2600f/s (810m/s) from a 24inch barrel. Hornady sst is 2580. I can't see any why PPU will not sell hear.
PPU did sell their 6.5 Grendel ammunition here but they had batches/lots of ammo which had blown primers here in the US. Prvi Partizan never disclosed their reasoning for recalling their ammo other than to mention there was a difference in some chambers which shot 6.5 Grendel ammunition.
I suspect PPU realized they had issues with some lots of ammo having bad brass or high pressures. To limit liability concern they pulled their 6.5 Grendel ammo and issued a recall. Serbian Military was testing 6.5 Grendel Ak variant M17 and the recalled ammunition could be used in a controlled test with the new weapon system.
PPU is reportedly releasing new 6.5 Grendel ammunition later this year. I hope PPU releases a new higher quality brass case with small rifle primer.
Comment
-
Comment