Thanks guys for the measurments. So my 18" Satern barrel iv had for 2 years has a slightly short chamber also. Iv been shooting it fine, very accurate.
AR-Stoner 6.5 Grendel barrel short chambered.
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Originally posted by BjornF16 View PostSemantics. The cannelure is not for locking the rear end to jacket; but as you say the "interlock" is for mechanically locking the jacket to lead. It just so happens that the cannelure and interlock ring are coincident.
The GMX and Barnes X bullets have grooves (aka cannelures) not for crimping, but for friction reduction and build up removal. Hornady's website specifically mentions reduced friction (reduction of contact surface area) while the article below talks about Barnes reasons for grooves (material build up/removal). They can be used for crimping, but that is not their primary purpose.
http://www.barnesbullets.com/partner...-triple-shock/
Comment
-
-
Here's my theory the Liberty barrels have always had a smaller chamber you can find references on this forum all the way back to 2011!! Thats why they get such good velocity and those of us with them and have not been able to load our pills out as far as Paul does with his SST's. That said we don't need to because we get awesome velocities in fact probably the fastest of any Grendel barrels. The more bullets go through the more it sort of opens as it breaks in. When the OP could not load factory AA then that set off a panic with folks measuring and other folks fanning the flames of panic.Last edited by Guest; 01-24-2014, 01:06 AM.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by LRRPF52 View PostI just measured a box of 123gr factory Hornady A-MAX for raw COL. Every cartridge was 2.250"-2.252". The ogive might be slightly different than the SST though, since I am able to load the 123gr A-MAX longer than the SST.
I made a dummy 123gr SST round, and tried it in my AA barrel, as well as a Satern 18" Grendel barrel. I can load it to 2.253" where it will just kiss the forcing cone. It chambers and extracts without force.
I also tested my long-loaded 123gr A-MAX in the Satern chamber, and no issues...chambers and extracts without force. That's a 123gr A-MAX at 2.275".
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Tedward View PostAre the barrels new or used? I think the issue is the new barrels that have not been broke in. My used Liberty barrel lets bullets drop in and out and the bolt closes with no issue.
Comment
-
-
All the resources I have seen discuss the cannelure as a crimping groove. It seems to have the fringe benefit of helping the jacket retain more lead mass in the rear of the bullet after expansion in tissue.
I wonder if the Interlock was inspired by this, combined with the gilding metal jacket. Either way, it shouldn't be buried beneath the neck.
Are the barrels new or used? I think the issue is the new barrels that have not been broke in. My used Liberty barrel lets bullets drop in and out and the bolt closes with no issue.Last edited by Guest; 01-24-2014, 01:13 AM.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by LRRPF52 View PostAll the resources I have seen discuss the cannelure as a crimping groove. It seems to have the fringe benefit of helping the jacket retain more lead mass in the rear of the bullet after expansion in tissue.
I wonder if the Interlock was inspired by this, combined with the gilding metal jacket. Either way, it shouldn't be buried beneath the neck.
They are used barrels, and factory ammunition dropped into them without issue when they were new, then fired, extracted, and ejected no problem. There hasn't been a "break-in" period with my barrel for reliable chambering of a wide variety of ammunition. Even the PPU 123gr SP factory ammo ran through my 16" Grendel.
I have 3 Liberty barrels and just traded one so have had four barrels. They break in but that can be accelerated with a fire lapping kit. Remember i was thinking about doing that with my Liberty barrel to reduce the ES? I wonder if someone had an issue with a new AA barrel taking measurements of the COAL before a single shot was fired and broken it? I wonder how the comments would have been like then?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by XcountryRider View PostI have 3 Liberty barrels and just traded one so have had four barrels. They break in but that can be accelerated with a fire lapping kit. Remember i was thinking about doing that with my Liberty barrel to reduce the ES? I wonder if someone had an issue with a new AA barrel taking measurements of the COAL before a single shot was fired and broken it? I wonder how the comments would have been like then?"Those who sacrifice liberty for security, deserve neither." Benjamin Franklin
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by XcountryRider View PostI have 3 Liberty barrels and just traded one so have had four barrels. They break in but that can be accelerated with a fire lapping kit. Remember i was thinking about doing that with my Liberty barrel to reduce the ES? I wonder if someone had an issue with a new AA barrel taking measurements of the COAL before a single shot was fired and broken it? I wonder how the comments would have been like then?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by LRRPF52 View Post
I wonder if the Interlock was inspired by this, combined with the gilding metal jacket. Either way, it shouldn't be buried beneath the neck.
I have stayed out of this thread for quite a few posts because no matter if this is an issue with a barrel, a reamer, an ammunition manufacturer, a combination of things, or none of the above, people will do whatever they feel they want to do no matter what.
Without intentionally ruffling feathers, I have read enough in this thread to know that even IF there DEFINITELY WERE defects in ANY product and I'm not saying that there definitely are in this case, or just tolerance issues on any end, there would be a lot of people who would be cognitively dissonant, and sit there doing things and trying things to ease the pain of how long they waited to complete something. That is understandable if you know humans, but is not acceptable. Once again, I am not taking "sides" on anything. I am simply saying that if it was any gun part, car part, airplane part, etc., that people have a way of doing things that make them feel better about things, which is natural, but not normally a good idea. I have my own ideas on this issue, but I will definitely know more tomorrow when I test another barrel. I am glad there are still people looking at this objectively and fairly without, what I think, involving emotions.
This is a great forum.Last edited by Grendanimal; 01-24-2014, 01:33 AM.
Comment
-
-
I always take COL measurements when developing a load, especially as I reference the data from the manufacturer when working with a new cartridge.
When seating the bullet, you need to know how deep it will be going into the case. Standard reloading practices begin with determining your maximum COL. To assume that any of us were doing otherwise makes me question what is going on here. COL is one of the most important data points that everyone I know references and keeps firmly in mind when loading.
I just pulled out some 2009 data written in my rifle-specific notebook where I log what I have done with the firearm from a reloading standpoint. My load data includes COL with each different projectile, and they are not all the same. This is basic reloading 101, finding your COL with each projectile.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Tedward View PostThanks for clearing up that the purpose of the cannelure is not for crimping or an issue if set behind the end of the case as stated by a few people.
Since the 123 SST was designed specifically for the Grendel, one would expect that the cannelure would be correctly lined up for crimping. For other bullets not designed specifically for the Grendel, they may or may not line up correctly.Last edited by BjornF16; 01-24-2014, 01:48 AM.LIFE member: NRA, TSRA, SAF, GOA
Defend the Constitution and our 2A Rights!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by LRRPF52 View PostI always take COL measurements when developing a load, especially as I reference the data from the manufacturer when working with a new cartridge.
When seating the bullet, you need to know how deep it will be going into the case. Standard reloading practices begin with determining your maximum COL. To assume that any of us were doing otherwise makes me question what is going on here. COL is one of the most important data points that everyone I know references and keeps firmly in mind when loading.
I just pulled out some 2009 data written in my rifle-specific notebook where I log what I have done with the firearm from a reloading standpoint. My load data includes COL with each different projectile, and they are not all the same. This is basic reloading 101, finding your COL with each projectile.
Comment
-
Comment