Well, the reticle can be seen here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dNyWmMZVkgc
It is shaped after training and exploits the shallow fall angle of the bullets. It is non-caliber specific, optimal scope setting and the killing windows just change a fraction between different loads. It is made for emergency response; both to deal with unexpected events where you need a better spy than a red dot offers as well as dominating a fairly long (7-800m) with accurate fire. If time permits, the reticle of course allows for whatever precision/ accuracy you can wring out of the system.
Also designed for shooters working alone, so the field where your eye has acute vision was left as clear as possible in order to maximize the chance of spotting your own shots. I will shortly mount one of these scopes on my Grendel just to show it works just as well there.
The prototype has been tweaked away from professional shooting and towards my own deer hunting. Allthough the design is registered, I chose to withhold significant details as it is cheaper than defending the patent paperwork in court.
It is shaped after training and exploits the shallow fall angle of the bullets. It is non-caliber specific, optimal scope setting and the killing windows just change a fraction between different loads. It is made for emergency response; both to deal with unexpected events where you need a better spy than a red dot offers as well as dominating a fairly long (7-800m) with accurate fire. If time permits, the reticle of course allows for whatever precision/ accuracy you can wring out of the system.
Also designed for shooters working alone, so the field where your eye has acute vision was left as clear as possible in order to maximize the chance of spotting your own shots. I will shortly mount one of these scopes on my Grendel just to show it works just as well there.
The prototype has been tweaked away from professional shooting and towards my own deer hunting. Allthough the design is registered, I chose to withhold significant details as it is cheaper than defending the patent paperwork in court.
Comment