The military needs a more aggressive policy about selecting E-6's & above with combat arms experience, aptitude, and warrior spirit to go into officer training. Some of the best PL's I've had were prior service 11B3B4's, 18BF7W3W7's, and 0321/0317 Recon/Scout Sniper Marines. My 1st Scout Platoon had the former SF Weapon's guy/E-7. My 2nd Scout Platoon had a former 11B3VB4W3 who had been in Panama with 82nd, was a graduate of the Army Sniper School (boo), and also the actual SOTIC course at Bragg, before going to OCS, and getting branched MI. My 3rd Scout Platoon had the former Recon/SS Marine E-6, so there was no lack of competence with any of them, and no NCO in any of those platoons could second-guess their experience, as many of them had more individual experience than the collective NCOs in the Platoon.
Likewise, having all been NCO's as leaders, after coming up through the ranks in Infantry, Airborne, and SF units, they knew what to demand from their Squad leaders, Platoon Sergeant, Company Commander, XO, and how to politic with the Battalion for needs of the Platoons, while also having a vast understanding of how their Platoons provide intel and support for the Battalion and line companies.
A fresh Lieutenant only understands a fraction of these things from a conceptual perspective at best, and spends about 8-12 months in an upward learning curve of every assignment throughout his first 5 years, and that's in a good unit. In a unit with a bad COC that doesn't train much, he becomes demoralized quite fast, and learns very little. Of course, deploying to any of the conflicts we have going on right now can be a much faster learning curve, but is still handicapped in many ways as the missions don't always match the unit METL Tasks.
If I was in charge....
I would outsource a lot of combat arms training to retired veterans of the appropriate duty positions and backgrounds for my unit, with the ARTEP mixed with a series of performance-based tasks agreed upon by the vets and Battalion/Brigade Leadership, leaving no room for skipping on the standards, and conducting as realistic as possible exercises, versus gubm't nut rolls canned like sardines.
There are more and more commanders open to battle-focused training nowadays, due to real-world requirements, so it is more feasible, and has been happening with regards to marksmanship if you look at the courses being run by many veterans of the SOF community, who are sourced by conventional units to run practical marksmanship courses where there is a measurable expectation and result of the training.
Infantry NCO and Officer Courses need to be as violent as practically possible, with maybe 5% classroom time at the most, and a brutal environment that has zero room for pansies, weak-hearted, and the limp-wristed. The corporate career ladder track system with checks and boxes, matrices, and gay terms thrown about like "vignettes" and such needs to get tossed out the window. There is too much glossing over of what you really do, and that is to deploy to foreign soil, locate, fix, close with, and destroy the enemy with fire and maneuver or direct close combat, until the mission is accomplished. This tickle-me Elmo crap has got to go.
The enemies of our sons who we will send into harms way are not learning about rights for the weak in society, or how to handle their Tricare benefits. They are laying in mortars, Dshka's, and conducting harassing ambushes with their uncles, fathers, and grandfathers. In other theaters, they learn that America is enemy #1, and the heart of capitalist greed, not how they need to try and understand us, and pursue diplomatic solutions to our trespass into their hemispheres. At the end of the day, they will need a good ol American boot in their face to show who will be running things if they get out of line.
Likewise, having all been NCO's as leaders, after coming up through the ranks in Infantry, Airborne, and SF units, they knew what to demand from their Squad leaders, Platoon Sergeant, Company Commander, XO, and how to politic with the Battalion for needs of the Platoons, while also having a vast understanding of how their Platoons provide intel and support for the Battalion and line companies.
A fresh Lieutenant only understands a fraction of these things from a conceptual perspective at best, and spends about 8-12 months in an upward learning curve of every assignment throughout his first 5 years, and that's in a good unit. In a unit with a bad COC that doesn't train much, he becomes demoralized quite fast, and learns very little. Of course, deploying to any of the conflicts we have going on right now can be a much faster learning curve, but is still handicapped in many ways as the missions don't always match the unit METL Tasks.
If I was in charge....
I would outsource a lot of combat arms training to retired veterans of the appropriate duty positions and backgrounds for my unit, with the ARTEP mixed with a series of performance-based tasks agreed upon by the vets and Battalion/Brigade Leadership, leaving no room for skipping on the standards, and conducting as realistic as possible exercises, versus gubm't nut rolls canned like sardines.
There are more and more commanders open to battle-focused training nowadays, due to real-world requirements, so it is more feasible, and has been happening with regards to marksmanship if you look at the courses being run by many veterans of the SOF community, who are sourced by conventional units to run practical marksmanship courses where there is a measurable expectation and result of the training.
Infantry NCO and Officer Courses need to be as violent as practically possible, with maybe 5% classroom time at the most, and a brutal environment that has zero room for pansies, weak-hearted, and the limp-wristed. The corporate career ladder track system with checks and boxes, matrices, and gay terms thrown about like "vignettes" and such needs to get tossed out the window. There is too much glossing over of what you really do, and that is to deploy to foreign soil, locate, fix, close with, and destroy the enemy with fire and maneuver or direct close combat, until the mission is accomplished. This tickle-me Elmo crap has got to go.
The enemies of our sons who we will send into harms way are not learning about rights for the weak in society, or how to handle their Tricare benefits. They are laying in mortars, Dshka's, and conducting harassing ambushes with their uncles, fathers, and grandfathers. In other theaters, they learn that America is enemy #1, and the heart of capitalist greed, not how they need to try and understand us, and pursue diplomatic solutions to our trespass into their hemispheres. At the end of the day, they will need a good ol American boot in their face to show who will be running things if they get out of line.
Comment