Lapping for accuracy
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Allen Roberts View PostI believe you A5B. Just tell the other 40 percent of shooters say bolt barrel marriages improve accuracy and 85 percent of the shooters out there say lapping the upper improves accuracy or better groups if we are talking about the same reason.
I think most people who say that lapping the reciver made the gun shot better, had some other issue and didn't know it and fixed it without knowing it and then turn around and account it to lapping the reciver.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by A5BLASTER View PostI'm not really worried about the other's. My testing is enough to proof to me that lapping is for a square bolt lock up and bolt life and bedding if for accuracy.
I think most people who say that lapping the reciver made the gun shot better, had some other issue and didn't know it and fixed it without knowing it and then turn around and account it to lapping the reciver.4x P100
Comment
-
-
I can see the benefit of lapping, or squaring the receiver to the barrel. If the barrel is pointing in a different direction to the scope then the size of the group [precision] will not be affected but the ability to predict and drive this group around the target [accuracy] will be. This is more noticeable the further the target is from the shooter.
I understand bedding to be an attempt to fix a sloppy fit between barrel and receiver by introducing more rigidity. Presumably, more rigidity will influence precision and in theory this makes sense. Whether bedding actually does improve precision in an AR is not universally agreed. In a bolt gun it is.
One is guaranteed to improve the guns performance while the other probably does, especially if the interface is sloppy. Or, you can get a tight fit to start with. I have tried gluing and it did not improve group sizes. Others however have found that it helps and swear by it.Last edited by Klem; 05-03-2020, 10:55 PM.
Comment
-
-
Allen,
Breaking-in a barrel is another contentious topic. I used to religiously spend an afternoon breaking in new barrels with shooting and cleaning, shooting and cleaning - I don't anymore. If there was any benefit to it I never saw it.
Top tier barrels like Krieger and Lilja come ready to shoot. The first few rounds fill the micro pores with copper which I deliberately don't remove. It has been years since I used copper cleaners like Sweets and Bore Tek. I noticed when you strip the bore of everything the next time you shoot is spent fouling and settling the barrel back into where the MPI was before you cleaned it. Now, I often just put the gun straight back in the safe with a length of anti-corrosion cord down the bore, no cleaning the bore. I still clean the carbon out with Butch's every now and then when the groups seem to be opening up but that's about it. The action gets cleaned every time, just not the barrel.
Comment
-
-
Allen,
For years I was institutionalized with the military dogma of having to clean every time a firearm is used and even when not used but idle for a long time. There's a good reason for doing this but it is still dogma, and a lot of the time, unecessary. As an individual however you do what's best for you. I started reading about guys not cleaning and also spoke with a gunsmith who said that cleaning is in the best interests of barrel makers - they wear out quicker (although I don't place much credibility on that if you are using soft brass brushes on steel). I also saw a barrel that had been cleaned so much with one side being biased by the way the guy pushed the rod through that it wrecked it.
If you are comfortable you have corrosion in check while the gun is in storage then why not give it a go. Keep a tally of group sizes and MPI and see the difference between cleaning and not cleaning between a shooting session. If nothing has changed the next time you pull it out then let it go another session, and so in until you see a change, or can't stand it anymore.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Klem View PostAllen,
Breaking-in a barrel is another contentious topic. I used to religiously spend an afternoon breaking in new barrels with shooting and cleaning, shooting and cleaning - I don't anymore. If there was any benefit to it I never saw it.
Top tier barrels like Krieger and Lilja come ready to shoot. The first few rounds fill the micro pores with copper which I deliberately don't remove. It has been years since I used copper cleaners like Sweets and Bore Tek. I noticed when you strip the bore of everything the next time you shoot is spent fouling and settling the barrel back into where the MPI was before you cleaned it. Now, I often just put the gun straight back in the safe with a length of anti-corrosion cord down the bore, no cleaning the bore. I still clean the carbon out with Butch's every now and then when the groups seem to be opening up but that's about it. The action gets cleaned every time, just not the barrel.
This has been my experience as well, and at times I wonder if the old conventional wisdom on such was still quite so relevant today. Today's modern machining, metallurgy, powder technology, and jacket technology; I'm just not experiencing much benefit to frequent cleaning, and often think it works against me, as it seems like it takes a few rounds (or strings even), to settle back down.Last edited by lazyengineer; 05-04-2020, 06:01 AM.4x P100
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by FRB6.5 View Post@Klem link to the anti-corrosion cord material you use? Not heard of this and sounds super interesting.Zerust Tube and Barrel Strips are rust prevention tube strips that are perfect for protecting gun and rifle barrels, or stored metal pipes from corrosion.
I'm paranoid I am going to forget it's there one day so I tie a big knot in the end - it sticks out like a chamber flag.
Comment
-
Comment