I'm new to the Grendel world but haven't found a magazine that I like. Would it be possible to use a MagPul .223 mag and replace the follower with a 6.5 one?
MagPul?
Collapse
X
-
When I tried using a PMAG, even with a few rounds, I experienced the first ever Failure to Feed malfs with 6.5 Grendel, after years of trouble-free function with CProducts mags.NRA Basic, Pistol, Rifle, Shotgun, RSO
CCW, CQM, DM, Long Range Rifle Instructor
6.5 Grendel Reloading Handbooks & chamber brushes can be found here:
www.AR15buildbox.com
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by lawndartmike View PostThe follower is only half the picture. The mag lips are also different.NRA Basic, Pistol, Rifle, Shotgun, RSO
CCW, CQM, DM, Long Range Rifle Instructor
6.5 Grendel Reloading Handbooks & chamber brushes can be found here:
www.AR15buildbox.com
Comment
-
-
i use a 10 round pmag and load 3 when I'm plinking as its a little easier on the brass if you want to see why you can't load many before they bind load sole into a clear lancer mag so you can see how not well they stack up, for hunting or anything where a misfeed may cost me anything more than a hassle on the bench i use tested steel magsPunctuation is for the weak....
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by 762n40 View PostI'm thinking someone with known skills could influence Magpul to make a magazine specific to the 7.62x39 & 6.5 Grendel cartridge.
Worth a try ?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by 762n40 View PostI'm thinking someone with known skills could influence Magpul to make a magazine specific to the 7.62x39 & 6.5 Grendel cartridge.
Worth a try ?NRA Basic, Pistol, Rifle, Shotgun, RSO
CCW, CQM, DM, Long Range Rifle Instructor
6.5 Grendel Reloading Handbooks & chamber brushes can be found here:
www.AR15buildbox.com
Comment
-
-
Well I did get an email back
Thank you for your inquiry. At this time we do not have plans to offer an AR15/M16 compatible PMAG for larger calibers such as the 6.8x43 SPC, 6.5 Grendel, or 7.62x39. The primary reason for this is due to the limited physical space inside of the standard M16 magazine well. In order to accommodate the increased case diameter of these cartridges, and the subsequent widening of the staggered cartridge stack, the walls of the magazine body would have to be dramatically thinned. This is not conducive to a robust polymer magazine design. Additionally, we recommend against using these larger cartridges in the PMAG as they will generally not load or feed correctly.
Not the news I was hoping for but still I've got to be impressed that they took the time to answer my question, and I've got to respect a company that wont make a product to make a few buck if the product won't meet their standards.
Comment
-
-
Why doesn't Lancer make one they use a metal reinforced magazine to my way of thinking it it shouldn't be too difficult to make the change to the feed lips and the deeper channel down the side (don't know the technical name for it ) but Lancer might be a better one to try to get them to make it
Comment
-
Comment