Support or Not support?

[Lemonaid]

Stories like this get me confused, its about Armed Black Supremacists. https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/202...e-sight-video/
It could be about the KKK or others that at the time are law abiding but the message they send out is abhorrent.
Should we support their 2nd amendment rights?
Solutions? Opinions?

[grayfox]

Not confusing at all.
Lots of panthers, weathermen, weather underground, marxists, dating all the way back to the 60's and 70's.
Think William Ayers. O true he's white but they don't mean to include him, he's one of their marxist thought leaders.
They sound like domestic terrorists.
It is not about the 2A at all. They are playing a semantics game, hiding behind 2A like terrorists do behind human shields.
The 2A was written that "a well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
Notice several things - not that domestic terrorists would even begin to look for clear as-written language:
1. A well-regulated militia: this is an armed force that is "well regulated", ie under some kind of discipline and control, not a blm mob.
2. necessary to the Security of a free State: they are not advocating any security, nor for a sovereign State of the US (note that, in the Constitution 3 distinct groups of people are specified: the States, the people, and the federal government. All 3 are distinct.) They are not advocating protection of any of the 50 states, they want to tear everything in those states down. They are looking to loot and steal anything they can get their hands on.

I can go on and on. It is a total bag of BS and double speak.
And violence.
2A simply does not apply to that situation. Unless someone needs to defend life/family/free State against the violence threatened by such groups.

[montana]

Stories like this get me confused, its about Armed Black Supremacists. https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/202...e-sight-video/
It could be about the KKK or others that at the time are law abiding but the message they send out is abhorrent.
Should we support their 2nd amendment rights?
Solutions? Opinions?

They are a racist and communist organization that has nothing to do with our Constitutional Republic. Hiding behind a right we agree with, "while blatantly opposing the other rights" is not a group to get behind or support..Just another fringe group blaming others for their failure in life..

[Lemonaid]

Grayfox, I am trying to get a handle on what should be done, if anything. Should the government take away their guns? A bad president for the average Joe. (Bad president, bad president ) It reminds me of not agreeing with what the other side says but defending their right to say it.
Say the government or police take away the Black Supremacist's guns. Would you support that action? Or defend their right to bear arms?
I have the same conundrum with Liberals who have been trying to destroy our 2nd Am. rights for decades. If they want to become gun owners should we be glad that they apparently changed or mad at their hypocrisy or their (Guns for us, but not for you.)

[Lemonaid]

They are a racist and communist organization that has nothing to do with our Constitutional Republic. Hiding behind a right we agree with, "while blatantly opposing the other rights" is not a group to get behind or support..Just another fringe group blaming others for their failure in life..

Can you support their right to bear arms and not support the organization? Or is support of their right to bear arms support of their organization?

[montana]

Can you support their right to bear arms and not support the organization? Or is support of their right to bear arms support of their organization?

What?? Of course these morons have the same rights and responsibilities as all Americans..Supporting the anti American, communist, racist crap they are spewing is another subject.. The 1st and 2ndA is every Americans birth right, "including the, inbred, hateful, racist, blm members" playing tough guy militants in the street .....

[Lemonaid]

What?? Of course these morons have the same rights and responsibilities as all Americans..Supporting the anti American, communist, racist crap they are spewing is another subject.. The 1st and 2ndA is every Americans birth right, "including the, inbred, hateful, racist, blm members" playing tough guy militants in the street .....

This is helpful. That was what bothered me, how to be critical of the organization, words and policies and not be against their constitutional rights.
On a bright note, perhaps the F.B.I. has infiltrated and is now 65% of the membership and is ready to arrest most of them on some discovered law breaking.

[grayfox]

What?? Of course these morons have the same rights and responsibilities as all Americans..Supporting the anti American, communist, racist crap they are spewing is another subject.. The 1st and 2ndA is every Americans birth right, "including the, inbred, hateful, racist, blm members" playing tough guy militants in the street .....

^^ this. yes they do have a 2A right, just like the 1, 3, 4, 5-10 rights as well. Those rights do not give them the right to terrorize or kill anyone as they advocate. So far all they've done AFAIK, is talk. And people also have the right to defend themselves families, their State, and their property against any action these jokers might try.

[A5BLASTER]

Looks like they need to be shoot on sight to me.

Dirty commies need to die.

[Popeye212]

They are pretty good at shooting themselves. So far the only victims are their own members.