Feinstein Compares Assault Weapons to Child Porn

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Feinstein Compares Assault Weapons to Child Porn

    She said in the committee hearing that just as the 1st amendment doesn't protect child porn, the 2nd doesn't protect assault weapons. AWB moves on the full senate on a 10 to 8 vote along party lines.
  • Ridgerider

    #2
    That women is sick

    Comment


    • #3
      Maybe she likes child porn.

      Comment


      • #4
        Go ahead and ban 'em and see what happens. I can't wait to be driving my new MRAP around.

        Comment

        • sneaky one
          Chieftain
          • Mar 2011
          • 3077

          #5
          The odds of this passing thru the full senate-congress-looks like a- we win. I think this semi human-f.stein-has never had a date,or one at at the range-with a retired Veteran. I think someone should enlighten her-someone has to date her-!! -someone has to enlighten her on bin laden-=bin swimmin-umm,,the rifle of choice-on that mission was an M16.
          warped said it was 7.62x51. we all miss warped-----
          Military speak -claimed it was a 5.56-Sig 516. unit.

          The current rifles-30 + yrs.= AR 15's , are semi auto only===(assault rifles have full auto capability also=switch no. 3).= not a full assault rifle, only a copy-in semi auto form.

          Feinstein needs to get gone. She is going senile, evil.
          None the less, she needs to get burned down HARD ON THIS, so called ban !!!!
          Cook her as a witch. Californians ==RISE UP !! cast her down -now is the perfect chance=Ah nuld eez done-

          Comment

          • sneaky one
            Chieftain
            • Mar 2011
            • 3077

            #6
            Keep and bear arms -is a tough one to fully describe-in modern day speak-yes they single-muzzle loaded it then--- times a change-- society changes also. We are pushing the envelope by trying to keep current weapons, we all know what we have-yet we don't want to lose our rights.
            Difficult time in OUR history. Fight tooth and nail for your rights, the gun is -almost secondary==we need to win!
            It's a political battle, more than a gun battle.
            Sorry for the ramble-yet I am so peeved!!!!!!!!!!!! Join the NRA
            S1
            Last edited by sneaky one; 03-14-2013, 11:46 PM.

            Comment


            • #7
              Let's not forget that the more Diane makes these ludicrous comparisons without challenge, the more real they become in the eyes of the gullible.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by kegs View Post
                Go ahead and ban 'em and see what happens. I can't wait to be driving my new MRAP around.
                The left does not understand that many Americans will ignore laws that they see as unjust. That is what happened with the 55 mph speed limit. And with Prohibtion. We tend to be passive-aggressive.

                How easy is it to smuggle things across the Mexican border? If ammo is already running 400% more than cost then does it not make sense that high profit margins will encourage more smuggling? That if they ban things then it gives incentive to smuggle?

                But then maybe it would take the smuggling of weapons and ammo across the border for the Feds to finally close the border.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Nobody is giving up their ARs or AKs in this country, at least no one who deserves to have them.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I think they know that.

                    Comment

                    • bwaites
                      Moderator
                      • Mar 2011
                      • 4445

                      #11
                      Originally posted by Trooper View Post
                      The left does not understand that many Americans will ignore laws that they see as unjust. That is what happened with the 55 mph speed limit. And with Prohibtion. We tend to be passive-aggressive.

                      How easy is it to smuggle things across the Mexican border? If ammo is already running 400% more than cost then does it not make sense that high profit margins will encourage more smuggling? That if they ban things then it gives incentive to smuggle?

                      But then maybe it would take the smuggling of weapons and ammo across the border for the Feds to finally close the border.
                      Even some legislators are starting to really get on the bandwagon of non-compliance.

                      Comment

                      • bwaites
                        Moderator
                        • Mar 2011
                        • 4445

                        #12
                        Originally posted by Nukes View Post
                        I think they know that.

                        Yes, but those are VERY vulnerable as has been demonstrated in multiple parts of the world! That's really a focus of fire and explosives. Works great against gang bangers, not so great in an uprising situation.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by bwaites View Post
                          Yes, but those are VERY vulnerable as has been demonstrated in multiple parts of the world! That's really a focus of fire and explosives. Works great against gang bangers, not so great in an uprising situation.
                          Rubber tires tend to burn for a while once they catch fire:

                          Comment

                          • leopard6.5

                            #14
                            I figured I could buy one as surplus once they figure out they can't afford to maintain them and that they won't do the job they think they will.

                            Lee

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X