AR15 SBR build

[Bigs28]

Earlier he said he wanted to build his with a 7" 300bo barrel. My comment was specific to this particular build

Edit he said 7.5" barrel

[A5BLASTER]

You make a good point.The sensible thing for me to do is build an AR pistol and put a brace on it. I can take it from there.

Sba4 pistol brace is what you seek.

[FLshooter]

Sba4 pistol brace is what you seek.

Thank you.
I found an SB tactical SBA4 AR 15 pistol brace and ordered it for just under $120 delivered on Optics Planet.

[michael18]

I have a question for anyone is it legal to have 5.56 for home defense

[Mustangfreek]

Lol..

Yes...but with that question you might want to ask yourself a few questions...another thread though..

On the Sbr deal, I think everyone should have at least one..

[LRRPF52]

[montana]

Nice synopsis, now it makes sense.

[StoneHendge]

LRRPF52, I would avoid using any arguments that relate to a law's age or it's context in time regardless of their validity. That's one of the major arguments used by those who not only want to get rid of the Second Amendment, but tear up the entire Constitution.

[biodsl]

LRRPF52, I would avoid using any arguments that relate to a law's age or it's context in time regardless of their validity. That's one of the major arguments used by those who not only want to get rid of the Second Amendment, but tear up the entire Constitution.

A couple of years back, one of my Facebook 'friends' made the argument that the 2nd Amendment was fine when written because mass shootings aren't really possible with muskets. With today's weapons the right to gun ownership needed to be reconsidered. I made the argument back that Freedom of Speech was fine when the only people that could hear your message were those within the sound of your voice on the street corner. Now that you can reach millions on the internet, the 1st Amendment might be too dangerous.

I didn't know Google, Twitter, Facebook and Youtube would take me seriously.

[LRRPF52]

LRRPF52, I would avoid using any arguments that relate to a law's age or it's context in time regardless of their validity. That's one of the major arguments used by those who not only want to get rid of the Second Amendment, but tear up the entire Constitution.