I think the basis for effective stopping power (killing) is a round that is powerful enough to get through common barriers (cars, various types of walls, soft body armor etc..), and still be able to penetrate through most of the body of whatever you're shooting at. At the same time, it can't be so dedicated to armor penetration that it just punches tiny holes in soft targets. Bullet construction is key, IMO. I tend to stray away from anything smaller than 6mm because small light bullets shed energy too quickly for my liking. On the other hand, if you go above about .40 cal, the wide, rounded bullets don't penetrate so well, and you have to increase weight (decrease velocity in standard sized cartridges) significantly to get anything out of them.
With that said, rounds like the 7.62x39mm, 7.92x33mm, 6.5 grendel, .280 british etc. are all good to go in my book for "assault" rifle rounds. The 5.56 in my opinion is on the weaker end of the spectrum, and while it does do the job, I feel other rounds do it better. 6-7.5mm is my personal ideal range for rifle rounds. For pistols, I prefer big and heavy bullets if they have to be slow. 40, 45, 10mm.
I also agree 100% with what LRRPF52 has said. As a USMC 0311 cross trained in physical security (share many police tactics), we're on about the same page. As soon as that guy's rifle broke the plane of the doorway he should have been done. Hell before that, as soon as he charged the police officer he should have been OC'd and cuffed. Actively resistant subjects are not who you want to let do what they want to do-- while watching that video I immediately picked up on the Deputy's voice pitch change and defensive behavior. When people try to get dominant to you, you have to get real mean real quick. Speed, surprise and violence of action is what we're taught. And even since boot camp "Mission of the Marine Corps rifle squad: To locate, close with, and DESTROY the enemy by fire and maneuver, or to repel the enemy's assault by fire and close combat!". As long as you have a weapon that is capable (semi-auto preferably, with a decent caliber, atleast 20 round mags) and the right mindset and training, that's emensely more important than minor caliber variations.
With that said, rounds like the 7.62x39mm, 7.92x33mm, 6.5 grendel, .280 british etc. are all good to go in my book for "assault" rifle rounds. The 5.56 in my opinion is on the weaker end of the spectrum, and while it does do the job, I feel other rounds do it better. 6-7.5mm is my personal ideal range for rifle rounds. For pistols, I prefer big and heavy bullets if they have to be slow. 40, 45, 10mm.
I also agree 100% with what LRRPF52 has said. As a USMC 0311 cross trained in physical security (share many police tactics), we're on about the same page. As soon as that guy's rifle broke the plane of the doorway he should have been done. Hell before that, as soon as he charged the police officer he should have been OC'd and cuffed. Actively resistant subjects are not who you want to let do what they want to do-- while watching that video I immediately picked up on the Deputy's voice pitch change and defensive behavior. When people try to get dominant to you, you have to get real mean real quick. Speed, surprise and violence of action is what we're taught. And even since boot camp "Mission of the Marine Corps rifle squad: To locate, close with, and DESTROY the enemy by fire and maneuver, or to repel the enemy's assault by fire and close combat!". As long as you have a weapon that is capable (semi-auto preferably, with a decent caliber, atleast 20 round mags) and the right mindset and training, that's emensely more important than minor caliber variations.
Comment