6.5Grendel vs 5.56NATO as General Purpose AR15 Chambering
#31
stanc Wrote:No one knows what pressures USGI 6.5 Grendel ammo would be loaded to. I don't see that being a reason to not evaluate the Grendel as it currently exists, just as a proof of concept.


It would certainly be desirable to have 6.5 Grendel loads with EPR bullets, as are in 5.56 M855A1 and 7.62 M80A1. But, since 6.5 EPR is not available, valid comparative testing could be done using PPU 6.5 FMJ vs 7.62 FMJ and 5.56 FMJ.


I agree that what caliber the Serbian Army opts to use for its small arms is not necessarily relevant to US requirements. However, since our military does project power around the globe, the idea that 6.5 Grendel promises 7.62 performance from machine guns and rifles of 5.56 weight, it seems like the Horde's favorite cartridge would be worth considering...….providing that it can be demonstrated to actually deliver the promised performance.

Stan:

Aint going to happen any time soon. The DoD seems perfectly happy with the EPR 7.62 and 5.56.

Do you actually think that the 6.5 PPU ball garbage will out perform issued M-80 and issued M-855?

Hasn't this discussion happened in about five other threads?

LR55
Reply


Messages In This Thread
6.5Grendel vs 5.56NATO as General Purpose AR15 Chambering - by LR1955 - 10-13-2018, 12:23 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)