08-10-2019, 01:00 PM
montana Wrote:If professional training is implemented, absolutely. Just with my experience in Practical shooting, my skill level and safe firearm handling had improved by 100%. My wife and daughter beat a retired SWAT team member from Los Angeles, and they did it safely. Nothing improves firearm skills better than putting rounds down range with skilled shooting instruction. Safe firearm practice becomes second nature as does shooting skills. Reckless shooting habits and skills or lack of, can have the opposite effect. .
Good for you and your wife!
Of course, training is very expensive. Who pays for all of these regular, professional, high speed, low drag training?
montana Wrote:People who are unwilling, too lazy, or too immature to pass basic firearm safety classes shouldn't own firearms in my opinion. There also needs to be class instruction on the legalities of firearm ownership and responsibility.
So you are for infringement of our 2nd amendment rights.
montana Wrote:People are not stupid and with the right training can be a big deterrent to crime if properly trained.
This sort of goes with the "more guns less crime" mantra of John Lott that was a complete fabrication based on misinterpretation of statistical data. People are stupid.
montana Wrote:I would rather have shooters like Jerry Miculek as my spokesman instead of some camouflage militia wanna be.
That's really interesting. You like the idea of a showman being the spokesperson for dealing with crime and defensive training issues.
Kill a hog. Save the planet.
My videos - https://www.youtube.com/user/HornHillRange
My videos - https://www.youtube.com/user/HornHillRange

