Most of my reloading experience has been with precision bolt guns. With that type of loading, I've always checked my distance to the lands and have tested various OAL before moving to ladder testing with powders. This was with Berger bullets and is described in there literature online. Is it even worth checking distance to the lands with a 6.5 grendel? Seems like all the bullet reloading data is showing a coal of 2.25 and generally magazine length is 2.26. I've got 3 different bullets I'm trying.
COAL-Just load to magazine length?
Collapse
X
-
-
Can't gas gunners buy barrel blanks or short chambered barrels, and give the smith a dummy round to chamber from. That's what serious bolt gunners do. With all the money that is spent on other cute gadgets, it seems like skimping on the barrel, the critical part, is pound foolish and penny wise ?
But what do I know ? :-))
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Bigs28 View PostLast trip to the range i made the same loads at 2.230 and 2.240 and found the 2.240 was more accurate across the board. So i personally would not just load to magazine length. Experiment and have fun.Originally posted by giannid View PostMost of my reloading experience has been with precision bolt guns. With that type of loading, I've always checked my distance to the lands and have tested various OAL before moving to ladder testing with powders. This was with Berger bullets and is described in there literature online. Is it even worth checking distance to the lands with a 6.5 grendel? Seems like all the bullet reloading data is showing a coal of 2.25 and generally magazine length is 2.26. I've got 3 different bullets I'm trying.shootersnotes.com
"To those who have fought and almost died for it, freedom has a flavor the protected will never know."
-- Author Unknown
"If at first you do succeed, try not to look astonished!" -- Milton Berle
Comment
-
-
I haven’t read the Grendel specific manual but have looked at the reloading data. The coal on the bullets of my choice is 2.25 which gives you a little room of adjustment barely. I’ve found it the past that the billeted can be a little long or short from batch to batch. It’s always best to leave a little wiggle room in something that has to fit in a magazine. I’ve had that problem with my ar when Sierra decided to make the newer bullets I’ve been using for years pointy. Had to adjust for it and change my coal as they would just fit in the magazine before the change.
Barrel is a Lilja a319 btw.Last edited by giannid; 10-01-2018, 12:45 PM.
Comment
-
-
I have run into a few different flies in the ointment as to seating depth of bullets. First off it depends on the magazine you are using as to what COAL you can use. Rounds loaded in Elander magazines have to be loaded shorter than rounds that can be used in ASC/AR-Stoner magazines to function. To get a consistent to the lands jump of a bullet always measure using a comparator and measure from base of case to ogive of the bullet because tips do vary in length. I have played with COAL and found some bullets do respond to as little as five thousands change in COAL. The big one is no two barrels are exactly the same. What might do best in my barrel will not be what your barrel of the same maker may want to shoot well. Don't you just love an adventure?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by giannid View PostI haven’t read the Grendel specific manual but have looked at the reloading data. The coal on the bullets of my choice is 2.25 which gives you a little room of adjustment barely. I’ve found it the past that the billeted can be a little long or short from batch to batch. It’s always best to leave a little wiggle room in something that has to fit in a magazine. I’ve had that problem with my ar when Sierra decided to make the newer bullets I’ve been using for years pointy. Had to adjust for it and change my coal as they would just fit in the magazine before the change.
Barrel is a Lilja a319 btw.
Several variables as others (combined) have stated.
First off, in talking and tweaking Coal's, I suggest you get down to the 0.001" dimensions as a minimum. 2.250 can differ from 2.255, or 2.248 (rounded to 2.25).
Sierra bullets have had, for me, up to +/- 0.005", so up to 0.010" delta round to round. The SMK's, confess I haven't used them as much but would expect maybe up to +/- 0.004, which means coal differences up to 0.008" cartridge to cartridge.
Eldm's and Nos Accubonds have varied for me up to about +/- 0.003", which have been the tightest tolerances I have seen.
SST's seem to like more jump rather than less, Berger's jump, well, goes without saying... so even the bullet mfr can introduce new variables.
So combine that with mags, throats, etc, there is room to play with on coal.
Find a sound load for your pipe then play with coal by +/- 0.010 like JAS wrote, and you'll find what the barrel likes the best.
Chasing accuracy is as much about the journey as it is the destination. Stay safe."Down the floor, out the door, Go Brandon Go!!!!!"
Comment
-
-
I’m using elander mags for reliability so I’m going to have to stick with what they let me load max. Will be doing a lot of night hunting for coyotes and hogs so reliability is a must. Hopefully I can find something that shoots well and fits in the mag. Will be loading 110 grain Lehigh, 120 grain elx max and 120 grain nosler ballistic tips all with 8208.
Comment
-
-
I’m going to try the c products mag first. Just got one off of eBay for $20 shipped. I think the extra length can only help. Has anyone actually ever found a bullet that actually shot better farther off than the lands or shorter coal in a 6.5 Grendel? Thinking I may just start with the longest coal that will fit in the mag and do my ladder test with powder.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by giannid View PostIs it even worth checking distance to the lands with a 6.5 grendel?
It's best not to just guess at a number, you need to check it to be sure.
Edit: These are the COALs I got with 4 bullets in my first Grrr barrel.
2.187", 2.162", 2.143", 2.217"Last edited by Randy99CL; 10-01-2018, 05:56 PM."In any war, political or battlefield; truth is the first casualty."
Trump has never had a wife he didn't cheat on.
Comment
-
Comment